Ceph has tried to (re)balance your data, backfill_toofull means no available space to move data, but you have plenty of space.
Why do you have so little pgs? I would increase the amount of pgs, but before doing so lets see what others will say. Sinan > Op 28 jul. 2018 om 11:50 heeft Sebastian Igerl <igerls...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, > > i added 4 more OSDs on my 4 node Test Cluster and now i'm in HEALTH_ERR > state. Right now its still recovering, but still, should this happen ? None > of my OSDs are full. Maybe i need more PGs ? But since my %USE is < 40% it > should be still ok to recover without HEALTH_ERR ? > > data: > pools: 7 pools, 484 pgs > objects: 2.70 M objects, 10 TiB > usage: 31 TiB used, 114 TiB / 146 TiB avail > pgs: 2422839/8095065 objects misplaced (29.930%) > 343 active+clean > 101 active+remapped+backfill_wait > 39 active+remapped+backfilling > 1 active+remapped+backfill_wait+backfill_toofull > > io: > recovery: 315 MiB/s, 78 objects/s > > > > > > ceph osd df > ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR PGS > 0 hdd 2.72890 1.00000 2.7 TiB 975 GiB 1.8 TiB 34.89 1.62 31 > 1 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 643 GiB 2.1 TiB 23.00 1.07 36 > 8 hdd 7.27739 1.00000 7.3 TiB 1.7 TiB 5.5 TiB 23.85 1.11 83 > 12 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 1.1 TiB 6.2 TiB 14.85 0.69 81 > 16 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.0 TiB 5.3 TiB 27.68 1.29 74 > 20 hdd 9.09569 1.00000 9.1 TiB 108 GiB 9.0 TiB 1.16 0.05 43 > 2 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 878 GiB 1.9 TiB 31.40 1.46 36 > 3 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 783 GiB 2.0 TiB 28.02 1.30 39 > 9 hdd 7.27739 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.0 TiB 5.3 TiB 27.58 1.28 85 > 13 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.2 TiB 5.1 TiB 30.10 1.40 78 > 17 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.1 TiB 5.2 TiB 28.23 1.31 84 > 21 hdd 9.09569 1.00000 9.1 TiB 192 GiB 8.9 TiB 2.06 0.10 41 > 4 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 927 GiB 1.8 TiB 33.18 1.54 34 > 5 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 1.0 TiB 1.7 TiB 37.57 1.75 28 > 10 hdd 7.27739 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.2 TiB 5.0 TiB 30.66 1.43 87 > 14 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 1.8 TiB 5.5 TiB 24.23 1.13 89 > 18 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.5 TiB 4.8 TiB 33.83 1.57 93 > 22 hdd 9.09569 1.00000 9.1 TiB 210 GiB 8.9 TiB 2.26 0.10 44 > 6 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 350 GiB 2.4 TiB 12.51 0.58 21 > 7 hdd 2.72899 1.00000 2.7 TiB 980 GiB 1.8 TiB 35.07 1.63 35 > 11 hdd 7.27739 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.8 TiB 4.4 TiB 39.14 1.82 99 > 15 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 1.6 TiB 5.6 TiB 22.49 1.05 82 > 19 hdd 7.27730 1.00000 7.3 TiB 2.1 TiB 5.2 TiB 28.49 1.32 77 > 23 hdd 9.09569 1.00000 9.1 TiB 285 GiB 8.8 TiB 3.06 0.14 52 > TOTAL 146 TiB 31 TiB 114 TiB 21.51 > MIN/MAX VAR: 0.05/1.82 STDDEV: 11.78 > > > > > Right after adding the osds it showed degraded for a few minutes, since all > my pools have a redundancy of 3 and i'm adding osd i'm a bit confused why > this happens ? I get why it's misplaced, but undersized and degraded ? > > pgs: 4611/8095032 objects degraded (0.057%) > 2626460/8095032 objects misplaced (32.445%) > 215 active+clean > 192 active+remapped+backfill_wait > 26 active+recovering+undersized+remapped > 17 active+recovery_wait+undersized+degraded+remapped > 16 active+recovering > 11 active+recovery_wait+degraded > 6 active+remapped+backfilling > 1 active+remapped+backfill_toofull > > > Maybe someone can give me some pointers on what i'm missing to understand > whats happening here ? > > Thanks! > > Sebastian > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
