guys, please tell me if I'm in the right direction. If ceph object storage can be set up in multi site configuration, and I add ganesha (which to my understanding is an "adapter" that serves s3 objects via nfs to clients) - won't this work as active-active?
Thanks On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Up Safe <upands...@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, thanks. > but it seems to me that having pool replicas spread over sites is a bit > too risky performance wise. > how about ganesha? will it work with cephfs and multi site setup? > > I was previously reading about rgw with ganesha and it was full of > limitations. > with cephfs - there is only one and one I can live with. > > Will it work? > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Adrian Saul < > adrian.s...@tpgtelecom.com.au> wrote: > >> >> >> We run CephFS in a limited fashion in a stretched cluster of about 40km >> with redundant 10G fibre between sites – link latency is in the order of >> 1-2ms. Performance is reasonable for our usage but is noticeably slower >> than comparable local ceph based RBD shares. >> >> >> >> Essentially we just setup the ceph pools behind cephFS to have replicas >> on each site. To export it we are simply using Linux kernel NFS and it >> gets exported from 4 hosts that act as CephFS clients. Those 4 hosts are >> then setup in an DNS record that resolves to all 4 IPs, and we then use >> automount to do automatic mounting and host failover on the NFS clients. >> Automount takes care of finding the quickest and available NFS server. >> >> >> >> I stress this is a limited setup that we use for some fairly light duty, >> but we are looking to move things like user home directories onto this. >> YMMV. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] *On Behalf >> Of *Up Safe >> *Sent:* Monday, 21 May 2018 5:36 PM >> *To:* David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> >> *Cc:* ceph-users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [ceph-users] multi site with cephfs >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> can you be a bit more specific? >> >> I need to understand whether this is doable at all. >> >> Other options would be using ganesha, but I understand it's very limited >> on NFS; >> >> or start looking at gluster. >> >> >> >> Basically, I need the multi site option, i.e. active-active read-write. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:50 PM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Object storage multi-site is very specific to using object storage. It >> uses the RGW API's to sync s3 uploads between each site. For CephFS you >> might be able to do a sync of the rados pools, but I don't think that's >> actually a thing yet. RBD mirror is also a layer on top of things to sync >> between sites. Basically I think you need to do something on top of the >> Filesystem as opposed to within Ceph to sync it between sites. >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:51 AM Up Safe <upands...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> But this is not the question here. >> >> The question is whether I can configure multi site for CephFS. >> >> Will I be able to do so by following the guide to set up the multi site >> for object storage? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 16:45 John Hearns <hear...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> The answer given at the seminar yesterday was that a practical limit was >> around 60km. >> >> I don't think 100km is that much longer. I defer to the experts here. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 16 May 2018 at 15:24, Up Safe <upands...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> About a 100 km. >> >> I have a 2-4ms latency between them. >> >> >> >> Leon >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 16:13 John Hearns <hear...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Leon, >> >> I was at a Lenovo/SuSE seminar yesterday and asked a similar question >> regarding separated sites. >> >> How far apart are these two geographical locations? It does matter. >> >> >> >> On 16 May 2018 at 15:07, Up Safe <upands...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build a multi site setup. >> >> But the only guides I've found on the net were about building it with >> object storage or rbd. >> >> What I need is cephfs. >> >> I.e. I need to have 2 synced file storages at 2 geographical locations. >> >> Is this possible? >> >> Also, if I understand correctly - cephfs is just a component on top of >> the object storage. >> >> Following this logic - it should be possible, right? >> >> Or am I totally off here? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Leon >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >> Confidentiality: This email and any attachments are confidential and may >> be subject to copyright, legal or some other professional privilege. They >> are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). >> They may only be copied, distributed or disclosed with the consent of the >> copyright owner. If you have received this email by mistake or by breach of >> the confidentiality clause, please notify the sender immediately by return >> email and delete or destroy all copies of the email. Any confidentiality, >> privilege or copyright is not waived or lost because this email has been >> sent to you by mistake. >> > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com