... we use (only!) ceph-deploy in all our environments, tools and scripts.

If I look in the efforts went into ceph-volume and all the related issues, 
"manual LVM" overhead and/or still missing features, PLUS the in the same 
discussions mentioned recommendations to use something like ceph-ansible in 
parallel for the missing stuff, I can only hope we will find a (full time?!) 
maintainer for ceph-deploy and keep it alive. PLEASE ;)
 
 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. April 2018 um 08:53 Uhr
Von: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com>
An: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] ceph-deploy: recommended?

On 04/04/2018 08:58 PM, Robert Stanford wrote:
>
>  I read a couple of versions ago that ceph-deploy was not recommended
> for production clusters.  Why was that?  Is this still the case?  We
> have a lot of problems automating deployment without ceph-deploy.
>
>

In the end it is just a Python tool which deploys the daemons. It is not
active in any way. Stability of the cluster is not determined by the use
of ceph-deploy, but by the runnings daemons.

I use ceph-deploy sometimes in very large deployments to make my life a
bit easier.

Wido

> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com[http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to