On 03/02/2018 01:24 AM, Joshua Chen wrote:
> Dear all,
>   I wonder how we could support VM systems with ceph storage (block
> device)? my colleagues are waiting for my answer for vmware (vSphere 5)

We were having difficulties supporting older versions, because they will
drop down to using SCSI-2 reservations if an ATS failed. Sometimes the
ATS-only setting worked and sometimes it didn't and in older versions it
may not have existed. We have not had time to fully debug and QE.

When distributed PGRs/reservation support is added it will not be a
issue, so we have been concentration on that instead of debugging each
vsphere version individually due to lack of time/resources.

SUSE's implementation does support distributed PGRs, so you should be
able to use it now.

Do you mean 5.0 or 5.5 btw? And if 5.0, just wondering why the older
version.

> and I myself use oVirt (RHEV). the default protocol is iSCSI.

For RHEV, RHCS iSCSI is supported with the current version. It works
like a normal old iSCSI target. There were no changes done to RHEV for
this, so I think it should work just fine with upstream/downstream ceph
iscsi and oVirt too.


>   I know that openstack/cinder work well with ceph and proxmox (just
> heard) too. But currently we are using vmware and ovirt.
> 
> 
> Your wise suggestion is appreciated
> 
> Cheers
> Joshua
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Mark Schouten <m...@tuxis.nl
> <mailto:m...@tuxis.nl>> wrote:
> 
>     Does Xen still not support RBD? Ceph has been around for years now!
> 
>     Met vriendelijke groeten,
> 
>     -- 
>     Kerio Operator in de Cloud? https://www.kerioindecloud.nl/
>     Mark Schouten | Tuxis Internet Engineering
>     KvK: 61527076 | http://www.tuxis.nl/
>     T: 0318 200208 | i...@tuxis.nl <mailto:i...@tuxis.nl>
> 
> 
> 
>     *Van: * Massimiliano Cuttini <m...@phoenixweb.it
>     <mailto:m...@phoenixweb.it>>
>     *Aan: * "ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>     <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>     <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>>
>     *Verzonden: * 28-2-2018 13:53
>     *Onderwerp: * [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?
> 
>         I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI.
>         But I just see from the docs that need:
> 
>             *CentOS 7.5*
>             (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4)
>             https://wiki.centos.org/Download
>             <https://wiki.centos.org/Download>
> 
>             *Kernel 4.17*
>             (which is not available yet, it is still at 4.15.7)
>             https://www.kernel.org/
> 
>         So I guess, there is no ufficial support and this is just a bad
>         prank.
> 
>         Ceph is ready to be used with S3 since many years.
>         But need the kernel of the next century to works with such an
>         old technology like iSCSI.
>         So sad.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         _______________________________________________
>         ceph-users mailing list
>         ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>         http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>         <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     ceph-users mailing list
>     ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>     http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>     <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to