On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:20 AM Maged Mokhtar <mmokh...@petasan.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > You need to set the min_size to 2 in crush rule. > > The exact location and replication flow when a client writes data depends > on the object name and num of pgs. the crush rule determines which osds > will serve a pg, the first is the primary osd for that pg. The client > computes the pg from the object name and writes the object to the primary > osd for that pg, then primary osd is then responsible to replicate with the > other osds serving this pg. So for the same client, some objects will be > sent to datacenter 1 and some to 2 and the osds will do the rest. > > The other point is regarding how to setup monitors across 2 datacenters > and be able to function if one goes down, this is tricky since monitors do > require an odd number and form a quorum. This link my is quite interesting, > i am not sure if there are better ways to do it: > > https://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2013/01/28/ceph-geo-replication-sort-of/ > > Fyi, I had this reply from Vincent Godin, you can search the ML for the full thread: Hello We have a similar design. Two Datacenters at short distance (sharing the same level 2 network) and one Datacenter at long range (more than 100km) for our Ceph cluster. Let's call these sites A1, A2 and B. We set 2 Mons on A1, 2 Mons on A2 and 1 Mon on B. A1 and A2 shared a same level 2 network. We need routing to connect to B. We set a HSRP Gateway on A1 & A2 to reach the B site. Let's call them GwA1 and GwA2 with default to GwA1 We set a HSRP Gateway on site B. Let's call them GwB1 and GwB2 with default to GwB1. GwB1 connected to A1 and A2 via GwA1, GwB2 connected to A1 and A2 via GwA2. We set an simple LACP between GwB1 and GwA1 ports and an other between GwB2 and GwA2 ports. (If GwA1 port is going down then GwB1 port will go down too) So if everything is OK, the Mon on site B can see every OSDs and Mons on both sites A1 & A2 via GwB1, then GwA1. Quorum is reached and Ceph is healthy if B1 site is down, the Mon on site B can see every OSDs and Mons on site A1 via GwB1, then GwA1. Quorum is reached and Ceph is available If A1 site is down, both HSRPs will change. The Mon on site B will see Mons and OSDs of the A2 site via GwB2 then GwA2. Quorum is reached and Ceph is still available if the L2 links between A1 & B2 are cut, the B2 site will be isolated. The Mon on site B can see every OSDs and Mons on A1 via GwB1, then GwA1 but cannot see Mons and OSDs of the A2 site because of the link failure. The quorum will be reached only on A1 site with 3 Mons and Ceph will still be available > Maged > > On 2018-02-14 04:12, ST Wong (ITSC) wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your advice, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Luis Periquito > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 11:34 PM > To: Kai Wagner > Cc: Ceph Users > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Newbie question: stretch ceph cluster > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Kai Wagner <kwag...@suse.com> wrote: > > Hi and welcome, > > > On 09.02.2018 15:46, ST Wong (ITSC) wrote: > > Hi, I'm new to CEPH and got a task to setup CEPH with kind of DR feature. > We've 2 10Gb connected data centers in the same campus. I wonder if it's > possible to setup a CEPH cluster with following components in each > data > center: > > > 3 x mon + mds + mgr > > In this scenario you wouldn't be any better, as loosing a room means > loosing half of your cluster. Can you run the MON somewhere else that would > be able to continue if you loose one of the rooms? > > > Will it be okay to have 3 x MON per DC so that we still have 3 x MON in > case of losing 1 DC ? Or need more in case of double fault - losing 1 DC > and failure of any MON in remaining DC will make the cluster stop working? > > > As for MGR and MDS they're (recommended) active/passive; so one per room > would be enough. > > > 3 x OSD (replicated factor=2, between data center) > > > replicated with size=2 is a bad idea. You can have size=4 and > min_size=2 and have a crush map with rules something like: > > > > rule crosssite { > id 0 > type replicated > min_size 4 > max_size 4 > step take default > step choose firstn 2 type room > step chooseleaf firstn 2 type host > step emit > } > > this will store 4 copies, 2 in different hosts and 2 different rooms. > > > Does it mean for new data write to hostA:roomA, replication will take > place as following? > 1. from hostA:roomA to hostB:roomA > 2. from hostA:roomA to hostA, roomB > 3. from hostB:roomA to hostB, roomB > > If it works in this way, can copy in 3 be skipped so that for each piece > of data, there are 3 replicas - original one, replica in same room, and > replica in other room, in order to save some space? > > Besides, would also like to ask if it's correct that the cluster will > continue to work (degraded) if one room is lost? > > Will there be any better way to setup such 'stretched' cluster between 2 > DCs? They're extension instead of real DR site... > > Sorry for the newbie questions and we'll proceed to have more study and > experiment on this. > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > So that any one of following failure won't affect the cluster's > operation and data availability: > > any one component in either data center failure of either one of the > data center > > > Is it possible? > > In general this is possible, but I would consider that replica=2 is > not a good idea. In case of a failure scenario or just maintenance and > one DC is powered off and just one single disk fails on the other DC, > this can already lead to data loss. My advice here would be, if anyhow > possible, please don't do replica=2. > > In case one data center failure case, seems replication can't occur any > more. Any CRUSH rule can achieve this purpose? > > > Sorry for the newbie question. > > > Thanks a lot. > > Regards > > /st wong > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > -- > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > HRB > 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- -- Alex Gorbachev Storcium
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
