Hello Kai, we use RBD's as part of pacemaker resource groups for 2 years on Hammer with no problems.
The resource is always configured in active/passive mode due to the fact that the filesystem is not cluster aware. Therefore during switchover the RBD's are unmapped cleanly on the active node before the resource moves. Regards Steffen >>> Kai Wagner <kwag...@suse.com> schrieb am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 um 13:00: > Hi all, > > I had the idea to use a RBD device as the SBD device for a pacemaker > cluster. So I don't have to fiddle with multipathing and all that stuff. > Have someone already tested this somewhere and can tell how the cluster > reacts on this? > > I think this shouldn't be problem, but I'm just wondering if there's > anything that I'm not aware of? > > Thanks > > Kai > > -- > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB > 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- Klinik-Service Neubrandenburg GmbH Allendestr. 30, 17036 Neubrandenburg Amtsgericht Neubrandenburg, HRB 2457 Geschaeftsfuehrerin: Gudrun Kappich _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
