I might be wrong, but from memory I think you can use http://ceph.com/pgcalc/ and use k+m for the size
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Ashley Merrick <ash...@amerrick.co.uk> wrote: > Hello, > > Are you having any issues with getting the pool working or just around the > PG num you should use? > > ,Ashley > > Get Outlook for Android > > ________________________________ > From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com> on behalf of Tim Gipson > <tgip...@ena.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 5:38:02 AM > To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Subject: [ceph-users] Erasure Coding Pools and PG calculation - > documentation > > Hey all, > > I’m having some trouble setting up a Pool for Erasure Coding. I haven’t > found much documentation around the PG calculation for an Erasure Coding > pool. It seems from what I’ve tried so far that the math needed to set one > up is different than the math you use to calculate PGs for a regular > replicated pool. > > Does anyone have any experience setting up a pool this way and can you give > me some help or direction, or point me toward some documentation that goes > over the math behind this sort of pool setup? > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! > > Thanks, > > > Tim Gipson > Systems Engineer > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
