Either ought to work fine. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:58 PM Andras Pataki <apat...@flatironinstitute.org> wrote:
> I'm planning to test the newer ceph-fuse tomorrow. Would it be better to > stay with the Jewel 10.2.10 client, or would the 12.2.1 Luminous client be > better (even though the back-end is Jewel for now)? > > > Andras > > > > On 11/02/2017 05:54 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > > Have you tested on the new ceph-fuse? This does sound vaguely familiar and > is an issue I'd generally expect to have the fix backported for, once it > was identified. > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM Andras Pataki < > apat...@flatironinstitute.org> wrote: > >> We've been running into a strange problem with Ceph using ceph-fuse and >> the filesystem. All the back end nodes are on 10.2.10, the fuse clients >> are on 10.2.7. >> >> After some hours of runs, some processes get stuck waiting for fuse like: >> >> [root@worker1144 ~]# cat /proc/58193/stack >> [<ffffffffa08cd241>] wait_answer_interruptible+0x91/0xe0 [fuse] >> [<ffffffffa08cd653>] __fuse_request_send+0x253/0x2c0 [fuse] >> [<ffffffffa08cd6d2>] fuse_request_send+0x12/0x20 [fuse] >> [<ffffffffa08d69d6>] fuse_send_write+0xd6/0x110 [fuse] >> [<ffffffffa08d84d5>] fuse_perform_write+0x2f5/0x5a0 [fuse] >> [<ffffffffa08d8a21>] fuse_file_aio_write+0x2a1/0x340 [fuse] >> [<ffffffff811fdfbd>] do_sync_write+0x8d/0xd0 >> [<ffffffff811fe82d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0 >> [<ffffffff811ff34f>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0 >> [<ffffffff816975c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff >> >> The cluster is healthy (all OSDs up, no slow requests, etc.). More >> details of my investigation efforts are in the bug report I just >> submitted: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/22008 >> >> It looks like the fuse client is asking for some caps that it never >> thinks it receives from the MDS, so the thread waiting for those caps on >> behalf of the writing client never wakes up. The restart of the MDS >> fixes the problem (since ceph-fuse re-negotiates caps). >> >> Any ideas/suggestions? >> >> Andras >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
