On 12 September 2017 at 01:15, Blair Bethwaite
<blair.bethwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Flow-control may well just mask the real problem. Did your throughput 
> improve? Also, does that mean flow-control is on for all ports on the 
> switch...? IIUC, then such "global pause" flow-control will mean switchports 
> with links to upstream network devices will also be paused if the switch is 
> attempting to pass packets from those ports down to a congested host.

Sorry, I didn't finish explaining that... The problem in the above
scenario is that global-pause is link-level, so even if you have other
flows destined for non-congested hosts on the same switch and plenty
of upstream/fabric link capacity for them, those flows will also get
paused due to a single congested downstream host. For any particular
topology and congestion rate there is likely to be a tipping point.

-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to