Thanks! On 2017年8月3日 +0800 21:50, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>, wrote:
Yes. The only "difference" is that the number of replicas is k+n combined. So if you have 6+2, then each PG will reside on 8 osds. The limitation is how many PGs an osd daemon is responsible for which directly impacts its memory requirements. On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, 6:32 AM Zhao Damon <yijun.z...@outlook.com<mailto:yijun.z...@outlook.com>> wrote: Hi everyone: I just wonder is erasure-code-pool’s pg num calculation rule same as common pool? _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
