Thank you for the clarification. I'm excited to give it a shot. On Jul 25, 2017 3:24 AM, "David" <dclistsli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding was Cinder is needed to create/delete/manage etc. on > volumes but I/O to the volumes is direct from the hypervisors. In theory > you could lose your Cinder service and VMs would stay up. > > On 25 Jul 2017 4:18 a.m., "Brady Deetz" <bde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for pointing to some documentation. I'd seen that and it is > certainly an option. From my understanding, with a Cinder deployment, you'd > have the same failure domains and similar performance characteristics to an > oVirt + NFS + RBD deployment. This is acceptable. But, the dream I have in > my head is where the RBD images are mounted and controlled on each > hypervisor instead of a central storage authority like Cinder. Does that > exist for anything or is this a fundamentally flawed idea? > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> oVirt 3.6 added Cinder/RBD integration [1] and it looks like they are >> currently working on integrating Cinder within a container to simplify >> the integration [2]. >> >> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/sto >> rage/cinder-integration/ >> [2] http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/cin >> derglance-docker-integration/ >> >> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Brady Deetz <bde...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Funny enough, I just had a call with Redhat where the OpenStack >> engineer was >> > voicing his frustration that there wasn't any movement on RBD for oVirt. >> > This is important to me because I'm building out a user-facing private >> cloud >> > that just isn't going to be big enough to justify OpenStack and its >> > administrative overhead. But, I already have 1.75PB (soon to be 2PB) of >> > CephFS in production. So, it puts me in a really difficult design >> position. >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Dino Yancey <dino2...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I was as much as told by Redhat in a sales call that they push Gluster >> >> for oVirt/RHEV and Ceph for OpenStack, and don't have any plans to >> >> change that in the short term. (note this was about a year ago, i >> >> think - so this isn't super current information). >> >> >> >> I seem to recall the hangup was that oVirt had no orchestration >> >> capability for RBD comparable to OpenStack, and that CephFS wasn't >> >> (yet?) viable for use as a "POSIX filesystem" oVirt storage domain. >> >> Personally, I feel like Redhat is worried about competing with >> >> themselves with GlusterFS versus CephFS and is choosing to focus on >> >> Gluster as a filesystem, and Ceph as everything minus the filesystem. >> >> >> >> Which is a shame, as I'm a fan of both Ceph and oVirt and would love >> >> to use my existing RHEV infrastructure to bring Ceph into my >> >> environment. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Brady Deetz <bde...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I haven't seen much talk about direct integration with oVirt. >> Obviously >> >> > it >> >> > kind of comes down to oVirt being interested in participating. But, >> is >> >> > the >> >> > only hold-up getting development time toward an integration or is >> there >> >> > some >> >> > kind of friction between the dev teams? >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ______________________________ >> >> Dino Yancey >> >> 2GNT.com Admin >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jason >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
