On 20 July 2017 at 12:23, 许雪寒 <xuxue...@360.cn> wrote: > May I ask how many users do you have on cephfs? And how much data does the > cephfs store?
https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/monash-university-improves-research-ceph-storage-case-study As I said, we don't yet have CephFS in production, just finalising our PoC setup to let some initial users have a go at it in the coming week or two. > interesting xattr acl behaviours (e.g. ACL'd dir writable through one gateway > node but not another), other colleagues looking at that and poking Red Hat > for assistance... This turned out to be some something about having different versions of the FUSE client on different SAMBA hosts - we hadn't finished upgrading/restarting them since upgrading to 10.2.7 (RHCS 2.3). Cheers, > On 17 July 2017 at 13:27, 许雪寒 <xuxue...@360.cn> wrote: >> Hi, thanks for the quick reply:-) >> >> May I ask which company are you in? I'm asking this because we are >> collecting cephfs's usage information as the basis of our judgement about >> whether to use cephfs. And also, how are you using it? Are you using >> single-mds, the so-called active-standby mode? And could you give some >> information of your cephfs's usage pattern, for example, does your client >> nodes directly mount cephfs or mount it through an NFS, or something like >> it, running a directory that is mounted with cephfs and are you using >> ceph-fuse? >> >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: Blair Bethwaite [mailto:blair.bethwa...@gmail.com] >> 发送时间: 2017年7月17日 11:14 >> 收件人: 许雪寒 >> 抄送: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> 主题: Re: [ceph-users] How's cephfs going? >> >> It works and can reasonably be called "production ready". However in Jewel >> there are still some features (e.g. directory sharding, multi active MDS, >> and some security constraints) that may limit widespread usage. Also note >> that userspace client support in e.g. nfs-ganesha and samba is a mixed bag >> across distros and you may find yourself having to resort to re-exporting >> ceph-fuse or kernel mounts in order to provide those gateway services. We >> haven't tried Luminous CephFS yet as still waiting for the first full >> (non-RC) release to drop, but things seem very positive there... >> >> On 17 July 2017 at 12:59, 许雪寒 <xuxue...@360.cn> wrote: >>> Hi, everyone. >>> >>> >>> >>> We intend to use cephfs of Jewel version, however, we don’t know its status. >>> Is it production ready in Jewel? Does it still have lots of bugs? Is >>> it a major effort of the current ceph development? And who are using cephfs >>> now? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> ~Blairo > > > > -- > Cheers, > ~Blairo -- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
