Hi Greg,
I was not clear enough. First I set the weight to 0 (ceph osd out), I waited until the cluster was stable and healthy (all pgs active+clean). Then I went and removed the now empty osds. That was when I saw degraded objects. I'm soon about to add some new disks to the cluster. I can reproduce this on the cluster if you'd like to see what's happening. What would help to debug this? ceph osd dump and ceph pg dump before and after the modifications? -- Eino Tuominen ________________________________ From: Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 19:20 To: Eino Tuominen; Andras Pataki; ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Degraded objects while OSD is being added/filled On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:47 PM Eino Tuominen <e...@utu.fi<mailto:e...@utu.fi>> wrote: Hello, I noticed the same behaviour in our cluster. ceph version 10.2.7 (50e863e0f4bc8f4b9e31156de690d765af245185) cluster 0a9f2d69-5905-4369-81ae-e36e4a791831 health HEALTH_WARN 1 pgs backfill_toofull 4366 pgs backfill_wait 11 pgs backfilling 45 pgs degraded 45 pgs recovery_wait 45 pgs stuck degraded 4423 pgs stuck unclean recovery 181563/302722835 objects degraded (0.060%) recovery 57192879/302722835 objects misplaced (18.893%) 1 near full osd(s) noout,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set monmap e3: 3 mons at {0=130.232.243.65:6789/0,1=130.232.243.66:6789/0,2=130.232.243.67:6789/0<http://130.232.243.65:6789/0,1=130.232.243.66:6789/0,2=130.232.243.67:6789/0>} election epoch 356, quorum 0,1,2 0,1,2 osdmap e388588: 260 osds: 260 up, 242 in; 4378 remapped pgs flags nearfull,noout,nodeep-scrub,require_jewel_osds pgmap v80658624: 25728 pgs, 8 pools, 202 TB data, 89212 kobjects 612 TB used, 300 TB / 912 TB avail 181563/302722835 objects degraded (0.060%) 57192879/302722835 objects misplaced (18.893%) 21301 active+clean 4366 active+remapped+wait_backfill 45 active+recovery_wait+degraded 11 active+remapped+backfilling 4 active+clean+scrubbing 1 active+remapped+backfill_toofull recovery io 421 MB/s, 155 objects/s client io 201 kB/s rd, 2034 B/s wr, 75 op/s rd, 0 op/s wr I'm currently doing a rolling migration from Puppet on Ubuntu to Ansible on RHEL, and I started with a healthy cluster, evacuated some nodes by setting their weight to 0, removed them from the cluster and re-added them with ansible playbook. Basically I ran ceph osd crush remove osd.$num ceph osd rm $num ceph auth del osd.$num in a loop for the osds I was replacing, and then let the ansible ceph-osd playbook to bring the host back to the cluster. Crushmap is attached. This case is different. If you are removing OSDs before they've had the chance to offload themselves, objects are going to be degraded since you're removing a copy! :) -Greg -- Eino Tuominen ________________________________ From: ceph-users <ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com>> on behalf of Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com<mailto:gfar...@redhat.com>> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 23:38 To: Andras Pataki; ceph-users Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Degraded objects while OSD is being added/filled On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:57 AM Andras Pataki <apat...@flatironinstitute.org<mailto:apat...@flatironinstitute.org>> wrote: Hi cephers, I noticed something I don't understand about ceph's behavior when adding an OSD. When I start with a clean cluster (all PG's active+clean) and add an OSD (via ceph-deploy for example), the crush map gets updated and PGs get reassigned to different OSDs, and the new OSD starts getting filled with data. As the new OSD gets filled, I start seeing PGs in degraded states. Here is an example: pgmap v52068792: 42496 pgs, 6 pools, 1305 TB data, 390 Mobjects 3164 TB used, 781 TB / 3946 TB avail 8017/994261437 objects degraded (0.001%) 2220581/994261437 objects misplaced (0.223%) 42393 active+clean 91 active+remapped+wait_backfill 9 active+clean+scrubbing+deep 1 active+recovery_wait+degraded 1 active+clean+scrubbing 1 active+remapped+backfilling Any ideas why there would be any persistent degradation in the cluster while the newly added drive is being filled? It takes perhaps a day or two to fill the drive - and during all this time the cluster seems to be running degraded. As data is written to the cluster, the number of degraded objects increases over time. Once the newly added OSD is filled, the cluster comes back to clean again. Here is the PG that is degraded in this picture: 7.87c 1 0 2 0 0 4194304 7 7 active+recovery_wait+degraded 2017-06-20 14:12:44.119921 344610'7 583572:2797 [402,521] 402 [402,521] 402 344610'7 2017-06-16 06:04:55.822503 344610'7 2017-06-16 06:04:55.822503 The newly added osd here is 521. Before it got added, this PG had two replicas clean, but one got forgotten somehow? This sounds a bit concerning at first glance. Can you provide some output of exactly what commands you're invoking, and the "ceph -s" output as it changes in response? I really don't see how adding a new OSD can result in it "forgetting" about existing valid copies — it's definitely not supposed to — so I wonder if there's a collision in how it's deciding to remove old locations. Are you running with only two copies of your data? It shouldn't matter but there could also be errors resulting in a behavioral difference between two and three copies. -Greg Other remapped PGs have 521 in their "up" set but still have the two existing copies in their "acting" set - and no degradation is shown. Examples: 2.f24 14282 0 16 28564 0 51014850801 3102 3102 active+remapped+wait_backfill 2017-06-20 14:12:42.650308 583553'2033479 583573:2033266 [467,521] 467 [467,499] 467 582430'2033337 2017-06-16 09:08:51.055131 582036'2030837 2017-05-31 20:37:54.831178 6.2b7d 10499 0 140 20998 0 37242874687 3673 3673 active+remapped+wait_backfill 2017-06-20 14:12:42.070019 583569'165163 583572:342128 [541,37,521] 541 [541,37,532] 541 582430'161890 2017-06-18 09:42:49.148402 582430'161890 2017-06-18 09:42:49.148402 We are running the latest Jewel patch level everywhere (10.2.7). Any insights would be appreciated. Andras _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
