On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Piotr Dałek <piotr.da...@corp.ovh.com> wrote: > Is this: > https://github.com/yuyuyu101/ceph/commit/794b49b5b860c538a349bdadb16bb6ae97ad9c20#commitcomment-15707924 > the issue you mention? Because at this point I'm considering switching to > C++ API and passing static bufferptr buried in my bufferlist instead of > having extra copy done by C API rbd_aio_write (that way I'd at least control > the allocations).
Yes, that is the issue along with the comment from Sage in your previous thread [1] where I proposed a potential workaround w/o the need to deeply perturb the messaging layer. [1] http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-January/015687.html -- Jason _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
