We used this workaround when upgrading to Kraken (which had a similar issue)

>modify the zonegroup and populate the 'hostnames' array with all backend
server hostnames as well as the hostname terminated by haproxy

Which i'm fine with. It's definitely a change that should be noted in a
more prominent release note. Without the hostname in there, ceph
interpreted the hostname as a bucket name if the hostname rgw was being hit
with differed from the hostname of the actual server. Pre Kraken, i didn't
need that setting at all and it just worked.

-Ben

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Ingo Reimann <ireim...@dunkel.de> wrote:

> Hi Radek,
>
> are there any news about this issue? We are also stuck with 10.2.5 and
> can`t
> update to 10.2.7.
> We use a couple of radosgws that are loadbalanced behind a Keepalived/LVS.
> Removal of rgw_dns_name does only help, if I address the gateway directly,
> but not in general.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ingo
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] Im Auftrag von
> Radoslaw Zarzynski
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 11:59
> An: Łukasz Jagiełło
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] RGW 10.2.5->10.2.7 authentication fail?
>
> Hello Łukasz,
>
> Thanks for your testing and sorry for my mistake. It looks that two commits
> need to be reverted to get the previous behaviour:
>
> The already mentioned one:
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca
> 16d7f4c6d0
> Its dependency:
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/b72fc1b820ede3cd186d887d9d30f7
> f91fe3764b
>
> They have been merged in the same pull request:
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11760
> and form the difference visible between v10.2.5 and v10.2.6 in the matter
> of
> "in_hosted_domain" handling:
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.5/src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc#L1773
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.6/src/rgw/rgw_
> rest.cc#L1781-L1782
>
> I'm really not sure we want to revert them. Still, it can be that they just
> unhide a misconfiguration issue while fixing the problems we had with
> handling of virtual hosted buckets.
>
> Regards,
> Radek
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Łukasz Jagiełło <jagiello.luk...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried today revert [1] from 10.2.7 but the problem is still there
> > even without the change. Revert to 10.2.5 fix the issue instantly.
> >
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca16d7
> > f4c6d0
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Radoslaw Zarzynski
> > <rzarzyn...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> >>
>
>
>
> Ingo Reimann
>
> Teamleiter Technik
> Dunkel GmbH <https://www.dunkel.de/>
> Dunkel GmbH
> Philipp-Reis-Straße 2
> 65795 Hattersheim
> Fon: +49 6190 889-100
> Fax: +49 6190 889-399
> eMail: supp...@dunkel.de
> http://www.Dunkel.de/   Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main
> HRB: 37971
> Geschäftsführer: Axel Dunkel
> Ust-ID: DE 811622001
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to