> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of 
> Blair Bethwaite
> Sent: 03 May 2017 09:53
> To: Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com>
> Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Intel power tuning - 30% throughput performance 
> increase
> 
> On 3 May 2017 at 18:38, Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com> wrote:
> > Seems to work for me, or?
> 
> Yeah now that I read the code more I see it is opening and manipulating 
> /dev/cpu_dma_latency in response to that option, so the
> TODO comment seems to be outdated. I verified tuned latency-performance _is_ 
> doing this properly on our RHEL7.3 nodes (maybe I
> first tested this on 7.2 or just missed something then). In any case, I think 
> we're agreed that Ceph should recommend that
profile.

I did some testing on this last year, by forcing the C-state to C1 I found that 
small writes benefited the most. 4kb writes to a 3x
replica pool went from about 2ms write latency down to about 600us. I also 
measured power usage of the server and the increase was
only a couple of percent.

Ideally, I hoping for the day when the Linux scheduler is power aware so it 
always assigns threads to cores already running in
higher C-states, that way we will hopefully get the benefits of both worlds 
without having to force all cores to run at max.

> 
> --
> Cheers,
> ~Blairo
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to