Oh wow, I completely misunderstood your question. Yes, src/osd/PG.cc and src/osd/PG.h are compiled into the ceph-osd binary which is included in the ceph-osd rpm as you said in your OP.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:10 AM, nokia ceph <nokiacephus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Piotr, > > I didn't understand, could you please elaborate about this procedure as > mentioned in the last update. It would be really helpful if you share any > useful link/doc to understand what you actually meant. Yea correct, normally > we do this procedure but it takes more time. But here my intention is to how > to find out the rpm which caused the change. I think we are in opposite > direction. > >>> But wouldn't be faster and/or more convenient if you would just recompile >>> binaries in-place (or use network symlinks) > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Piotr Dałek <piotr.da...@corp.ovh.com> > wrote: >> >> On 03/23/2017 02:02 PM, nokia ceph wrote: >> >>> Hello Piotr, >>> >>> We do customizing ceph code for our testing purpose. It's a part of our >>> R&D :) >>> >>> Recompiling source code will create 38 rpm's out of these I need to find >>> which one is the correct rpm which I made change in the source code. >>> That's >>> what I'm try to figure out. >> >> >> Yes, I understand that. But wouldn't be faster and/or more convenient if >> you would just recompile binaries in-place (or use network symlinks) instead >> of packaging entire Ceph and (re)installing its packages each time you do >> the change? Generating RPMs takes a while. >> >> >> -- >> Piotr Dałek >> piotr.da...@corp.ovh.com >> https://www.ovh.com/us/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Cheers, Brad _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
