On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Zhongyan Gu <zhongyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, we have already included this fix in our test setup. I think this time > we encountered another potential bug in the export process. we are diving > into the code and trying the easy-reproduce-case.
Even you know you can eventually reproduce the issue, may I suggest that you capture the logs from "rbd export-diff --debug-rbd=20 --debug-rados=20 --from-snap <snap-name> <image-spec>@<snap-name>" from before and after you detect the issue. Hopefully that will allow the issue to be narrowed down. > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Zhongyan Gu <zhongyan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > You mentioned the fix is scheduled to be included in Hammer 0.94.10, Is >> > there any fix already there?? >> >> The fix for that specific diff issue is included in the hammer branch >> [1][2] -- but 0.94.10 hasn't been released yet. >> >> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18111 >> [2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12446 >> >> -- >> Jason > > -- Jason _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
