> Op 17 februari 2017 om 11:09 schreef george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk: > > > Hi Wido, > > In an effort to get the cluster to complete peering that PG (as we need to be > able to use our pool) we have removed osd.595 from the CRUSH map to allow a > new mapping to occur. > > When I left the office yesterday osd.307 had replaced osd.595 in the up set > but the acting set had CRUSH_ITEM_NONE in place of the primary. The PG was in > a remapped+peering state and recovery was taking place for the other PGs that > lived on that OSD. > Worth noting that osd.307 in on the same host as osd.595. > > We’ll have a look on osd.595 like you suggested. >
If the PG still doesn't recover do the same on osd.307 as I think that 'ceph pg X query' still hangs? The info from ceph-objectstore-tool might shed some more light on this PG. Wido > > > On 17/02/2017, 06:48, "Wido den Hollander" <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > > > >> Op 16 februari 2017 om 14:55 schreef george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk: > >> > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I have just made a tracker for this issue: > >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18960 > >> I used ceph-post-file to upload some logs from the primary OSD for the > >> troubled PG. > >> > >> Any help would be appreciated. > >> > >> If we can't get it to peer, we'd like to at least get it unstuck, even if > >> it means data loss. > >> > >> What's the proper way to go about doing that? > > > >Can you try this: > > > >1. Go to the host > >2. Stop OSD 595 > >3. ceph-objectstore-tool --data-path /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-595 --op info > >--pgid 1.323 > > > >What does osd.595 think about that PG? > > > >You could even try 'rm-past-intervals' with the object-store tool, but that > >might be a bit dangerous. Wouldn't do that immediately. > > > >Wido > > > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> George > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: ceph-users [ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] on behalf of > >> george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk [george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk] > >> Sent: 14 February 2017 10:27 > >> To: bhubb...@redhat.com; ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] PG stuck peering after host reboot > >> > >> Hi Brad, > >> > >> I'll be doing so later in the day. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> George > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Brad Hubbard [bhubb...@redhat.com] > >> Sent: 13 February 2017 22:03 > >> To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC); Ceph Users > >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] PG stuck peering after host reboot > >> > >> I'd suggest creating a tracker and uploading a full debug log from the > >> primary so we can look at this in more detail. > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:11 PM, <george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote: > >> > Hi Brad, > >> > > >> > I could not tell you that as `ceph pg 1.323 query` never completes, it > >> > just hangs there. > >> > > >> > On 11/02/2017, 00:40, "Brad Hubbard" <bhubb...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:36 AM, <george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk> > >> > wrote: > >> > > Hi Corentin, > >> > > > >> > > I've tried that, the primary hangs when trying to injectargs so I > >> > set the option in the config file and restarted all OSDs in the PG, it > >> > came up with: > >> > > > >> > > pg 1.323 is remapped+peering, acting > >> > [595,1391,2147483647,127,937,362,267,320,7,634,716] > >> > > > >> > > Still can't query the PG, no error messages in the logs of osd.240. > >> > > The logs on osd.595 and osd.7 still fill up with the same messages. > >> > > >> > So what does "peering_blocked_by_detail" show in that case since it > >> > can no longer show "peering_blocked_by_history_les_bound"? > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > > >> > > George > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > From: Corentin Bonneton [l...@titin.fr] > >> > > Sent: 08 February 2017 16:31 > >> > > To: Vasilakakos, George (STFC,RAL,SC) > >> > > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] PG stuck peering after host reboot > >> > > > >> > > Hello, > >> > > > >> > > I already had the case, I applied the parameter > >> > (osd_find_best_info_ignore_history_les) to all the osd that have > >> > reported the queries blocked. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Cordialement, > >> > > CEO FEELB | Corentin BONNETON > >> > > cont...@feelb.io<mailto:cont...@feelb.io> > >> > > > >> > > Le 8 févr. 2017 à 17:17, > >> > george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:george.vasilaka...@stfc.ac.uk> a > >> > écrit : > >> > > > >> > > Hi Ceph folks, > >> > > > >> > > I have a cluster running Jewel 10.2.5 using a mix EC and > >> > replicated pools. > >> > > > >> > > After rebooting a host last night, one PG refuses to complete > >> > peering > >> > > > >> > > pg 1.323 is stuck inactive for 73352.498493, current state > >> > peering, last acting [595,1391,240,127,937,362,267,320,7,634,716] > >> > > > >> > > Restarting OSDs or hosts does nothing to help, or sometimes > >> > results in things like this: > >> > > > >> > > pg 1.323 is remapped+peering, acting > >> > [2147483647,1391,240,127,937,362,267,320,7,634,716] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > The host that was rebooted is home to osd.7 (8). If I go onto it > >> > to look at the logs for osd.7 this is what I see: > >> > > > >> > > $ tail -f /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.7.log > >> > > 2017-02-08 15:41:00.445247 7f5fcc2bd700 0 -- > >> > XXX.XXX.XXX.172:6905/20510 >> XXX.XXX.XXX.192:6921/55371 > >> > pipe(0x7f6074a0b400 sd=34 :42828 s=2 pgs=319 cs=471 l=0 > >> > c=0x7f6070086700).fault, initiating reconnect > >> > > > >> > > I'm assuming that in IP1:port1/PID1 >> IP2:port2/PID2 the >> > >> > indicates the direction of communication. I've traced these to osd.7 > >> > (rank 8 in the stuck PG) reaching out to osd.595 (the primary in the > >> > stuck PG). > >> > > > >> > > Meanwhile, looking at the logs of osd.595 I see this: > >> > > > >> > > $ tail -f /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.595.log > >> > > 2017-02-08 15:41:15.760708 7f1765673700 0 -- > >> > XXX.XXX.XXX.192:6921/55371 >> XXX.XXX.XXX.172:6905/20510 > >> > pipe(0x7f17b2911400 sd=101 :6921 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0 > >> > c=0x7f17b7beaf00).accept connect_seq 478 vs existing 477 state standby > >> > > 2017-02-08 15:41:20.768844 7f1765673700 0 bad crc in front > >> > 1941070384 != exp 3786596716 > >> > > > >> > > which again shows osd.595 reaching out to osd.7 and from what I > >> > could gather the CRC problem is about messaging. > >> > > > >> > > Google searching has yielded nothing particularly useful on how to > >> > get this unstuck. > >> > > > >> > > ceph pg 1.323 query seems to hang forever but it completed once > >> > last night and I noticed this: > >> > > > >> > > "peering_blocked_by_detail": [ > >> > > { > >> > > "detail": "peering_blocked_by_history_les_bound" > >> > > } > >> > > > >> > > We have seen this before and it was cleared by setting > >> > osd_find_best_info_ignore_history_les to true for the first two OSDs on > >> > the stuck PGs (this was on a 3 replica pool). This hasn't worked in this > >> > case and I suspect the option needs to be set on either a majority of > >> > OSDs or enough k number of OSDs to be able to use their data and ignore > >> > history. > >> > > > >> > > We would really appreciate any guidance and/or help the community > >> > can offer! > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > ceph-users mailing list > >> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cheers, > >> > Brad > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Brad > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
