I remember seeing one of the openATTIC project people on the list
mentioning that.

My initial question is, "Can you configure openATTIC just to monitor an
existing cluster without having to build a new one?"

//Tu
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:10 AM Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com>
wrote:

> Another tool :
>
> http://openattic.org/
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Marko Stojanovic" <mstojano...@vast.com>
> À: "Tu Holmes" <tu.hol...@gmail.com>, "John Petrini" <
> jpetr...@coredial.com>
> Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 13 Janvier 2017 09:30:16
> Objet: Re: [ceph-users] Calamari or Alternative
>
>
>
> There is another nice tool for ceph monitoring:
>
>
> [ https://github.com/inkscope/inkscope |
> https://github.com/inkscope/inkscope ]
> Little hard to setup but beside just monitoring you can also manage some
> items using it.
>
>
> regards
> Marko
>
>
> On 1/13/17 07:30, Tu Holmes wrote:
>
>
> I'll give ceph-dash a look.
>
> Thanks!
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:19 PM John Petrini < [ mailto:
> jpetr...@coredial.com | jpetr...@coredial.com ] > wrote:
>
> BQ_BEGIN
>
> I used Calamari before making the move to Ubuntu 16.04 and upgrading to
> Jewel. At the time I tried to install it on 16.04 but couldn't get it
> working.
>
> I'm now using [ https://github.com/Crapworks/ceph-dash | ceph-dash ]
> along with the nagios plugin [
> https://github.com/Crapworks/check_ceph_dash | check_ceph_dash ] and I've
> found that this gets me everything I need. A nice looking dashboard, graphs
> and alerting on the most important stats.
>
> Another plus is that it's incredibly easy to setup; you can have the
> dashboard up and running in five minutes.
>
>
>
> ___
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Tu Holmes < [ mailto:tu.hol...@gmail.com
> | tu.hol...@gmail.com ] > wrote:
>
> BQ_BEGIN
> Hey Cephers.
>
> Question for you.
>
> Do you guys use Calamari or an alternative?
>
> If so, why has the installation of Calamari not really gotten much better
> recently.
>
> Are you still building the vagrant installers and building packages?
>
> Just wondering what you are all doing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> //Tu
>
>
>
>
>
> BQ_BEGIN
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> [ mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com | ceph-users@lists.ceph.com ]
> [ http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com |
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com ]
>
>
> BQ_END
>
>
>
> BQ_END
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list [ mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com |
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com ] [
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com |
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com ]
>
> BQ_END
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to