I can confirm the latest packages upgrade fixes this issue.

Em 9 de dez de 2016 7:48 PM, "Reed Dier" <reed.d...@focusvq.com> escreveu:

> I don’t think there is a graceful path to downgrade.
>
> There is a hot fix upstream I believe. My understanding is the build is
> being tested for release.
>
> Francois Lafont posted in the other thread:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Francois Lafont <francois.lafont.1...@gmail.com>
> *Subject: **Re: [ceph-users] 10.2.4 Jewel released*
> *Date: *December 9, 2016 at 11:54:06 AM CST
> *To: *"ceph-users@lists.ceph.com" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> *Content-Type: *text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On 12/09/2016 06:39 PM, Alex Evonosky wrote:
>
> Sounds great.  May I asked what procedure you did to upgrade?
>
>
> Of course. ;)
>
> It's here: https://shaman.ceph.com/repos/ceph/wip-msgr-jewel-fix2/
> (I think this link was pointed by Greg Farnum or Sage Weil in a
> previous message).
>
> Personally I use Ubuntu Trusty, so for me in the page above leads me
> to use this line in my "sources.list":
>
> deb http://3.chacra.ceph.com/r/ceph/wip-msgr-jewel-fix2/
> 5d3c76c1c6e991649f0beedb80e6823606176d9e/ubuntu/trusty/flavors/default/
> trusty main
>
> And after that "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade" etc.
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
> This is obviously geared towards Ubuntu/Debian, though I’d assume theres
> an rpm of the same build accessible.
>
> Reed
>
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 4:43 PM, lewis.geo...@innoscale.net wrote:
>
> Hi Reed,
> Yes, this was just installed yesterday and that is the version. I just
> retested and it is exactly 15 minutes when the load starts to climb.
>
> So, just like Diego, do you know if there is a fix for this yet and when
> it might be available on the repo? Should I try to install the prior minor
> release version for now?
>
> Thank you for the information.
>
> Have a good day,
>
> Lewis George
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Diego Castro" <diego.cas...@getupcloud.com>
> *Sent*: Friday, December 9, 2016 2:26 PM
> *To*: "Reed Dier" <reed.d...@focusvq.com>
> *Cc*: lewis.geo...@innoscale.net, ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> *Subject*: Re: [ceph-users] High load on OSD processes
>
> Same here, is there any ETA to publish CentOS packages?
>
>
> ---
> Diego Castro / The CloudFather
> GetupCloud.com <http://getupcloud.com> - Eliminamos a Gravidade
>
> 2016-12-09 18:59 GMT-03:00 Reed Dier <reed.d...@focusvq.com>:
>>
>> Assuming you deployed within the last 48 hours, I’m going to bet you are
>> using v10.2.4 which has an issue that causes high cpu utilization.
>>
>> Should see large ramp up in loadav after 15 minutes exactly.
>>
>> See mailing list thread here: https://www.mail-archive
>> .com/ceph-users@lists.ceph.com/msg34390.html
>>
>> Reed
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2016, at 3:25 PM, lewis.geo...@innoscale.net wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am testing out a new node setup for us and I have configured a node in
>> a single node cluster. It has 24 OSDs. Everything looked okay during the
>> initial build and I was able to run the 'rados bench' on it just fine.
>> However, if I just let the cluster sit and run for a few minutes without
>> anything happening, the load starts to go up quickly. Each OSD device ends
>> up using 130% CPU, with the load on the box hitting 550.00. No operations
>> are going on, nothing shows up in the logs as happening or wrong. If I
>> restart the OSD processes, the load stays down for a few minutes(almost at
>> nothing) and then just jumps back up again.
>>
>> Any idea what could cause this or a direction I can look to check it?
>>
>> Have a good day,
>>
>> Lewis George
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to