> Op 7 december 2016 om 16:38 schreef John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com>: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > (I think John knows the answer, but sending to ceph-users for archival > > purposes) > > > > Hi John, > > > > A Ceph cluster lost a PG with CephFS metadata in there and it is currently > > doing a CephFS disaster recovery as described here: > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/disaster-recovery/ > > I wonder if this has any relation to your thread about size=2 pools ;-)
Yes, it does! > > > This data pool has 1.4B objects and currently has 16 concurrent > > scan_extents scans running: > > > > # cephfs-data-scan --debug-rados=10 scan_extents --worker_n 0 --worker_m 16 > > cephfs_metadata > > # cephfs-data-scan --debug-rados=10 scan_extents --worker_n 1 --worker_m 16 > > cephfs_metadata > > .. > > .. > > # cephfs-data-scan --debug-rados=10 scan_extents --worker_n 15 --worker_m > > 16 cephfs_metadata > > > > According to the source in DataScan.cc: > > * worker_n: Worker number > > * worker_m: Worker count > > > > So with the commands above I have 16 workers running, correct? For the > > scan_inodes I want to scale out to 32 workers to speed up the process even > > more. > > > > Just to double-check before I send a new PR to update the docs, this is the > > right way to run the tool, correct? > > It looks like you're targeting cephfs_metadata instead of your data pool. > > scan_extents and scan_inodes operate on data pools, even if your goal > is to rebuild your metadata pool (the argument is what you are > scanning, not what you are writing to). That was a typo of me when typing this e-mail. It is scanning the *data* pool at the moment. Can you confirm that the worker_n and worker_m arguments are the correct ones? > > There is also a "scan_frags" command that operates on a metadata pool. Didn't know that. In this case the metadata pool is missing objects due to that lost PG. I think the scan_extents and scan_inodes on the *data* pool is the correct way to rebuild the metadata pool if it is missing objects, right? Wido > > John > > > If not, before sending the PR and starting scan_inodes on this cluster, > > what is the correct way to invoke the tool? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Wido _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
