Hi,
As promised, our findings so far:
* For the time being, the new scrubbing parameters work well.
* Using CFQ for spinners and NOOP voor SSD seems to spread load over
the storage cluster a little better than deadline does. However,
overall latency seems (just a feeling, no numbers there) a little
higher.
Cheers,
Kees
On 28-10-16 15:37, Kees Meijs wrote:
>
> Interesting... We're now running using deadline. In other posts I read
> about noop for SSDs instead of CFQ.
>
> Since we're using spinners with SSD journals; does it make since to
> mix the scheduler? E.g. CFG for spinners _and_ noop for SSD?
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
