Hi Johan, Many thanks for your reply. I will try to play with the mds tunables and report back to your ASAP.
So far I see that mds log contains a lot of errors of the following kind: 2016-10-02 11:58:03.002769 7f8372d54700 0 mds.0.cache.dir(100056ddecd) _fetched badness: got (but i already had) [inode 10005729a77 [2,head] ~mds0/stray1/10005729a77 auth v67464942 s=196728 nl=0 n(v0 b196728 1=1+0) (iversion lock) 0x7f84acae82a0] mode 33204 mtime 2016-08-07 23:06:29.776298 2016-10-02 11:58:03.002789 7f8372d54700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : loaded dup inode 10005729a77 [2,head] v68621 at /users/mykola/mms/NCSHNO/final/120nm-uniform-h8200/j002654.out/m_xrange192-320_yrange192-320_016232.dump, but inode 10005729a77.head v67464942 already exists at ~mds0/stray1/10005729a77 Those folders within mds.0.cache.dir that got badness report a size of 16EB on the clients. rm on them fails with 'Directory not empty'. As for the "Client failing to respond to cache pressure", I have 2 kernel clients on 4.4.21, 1 on 4.7.5 and 16 fuse clients always running the most recent release version of ceph-fuse. The funny thing is that every single client misbehaves from time to time. I am aware of quite discussion about this issue on the ML, but cannot really follow how to debug it. Regards, -Mykola On 2 October 2016 at 22:27, John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Mykola Dvornik > <mykola.dvor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After upgrading to 10.2.3 we frequently see messages like > > From which version did you upgrade? > > > 'rm: cannot remove '...': No space left on device > > > > The folders we are trying to delete contain approx. 50K files 193 KB > each. > > My guess would be that you are hitting the new > mds_bal_fragment_size_max check. This limits the number of entries > that the MDS will create in a single directory fragment, to avoid > overwhelming the OSD with oversized objects. It is 100000 by default. > This limit also applies to "stray" directories where unlinked files > are put while they wait to be purged, so you could get into this state > while doing lots of deletions. There are ten stray directories that > get a roughly even share of files, so if you have more than about one > million files waiting to be purged, you could see this condition. > > The "Client failing to respond to cache pressure" messages may play a > part here -- if you have misbehaving clients then they may cause the > MDS to delay purging stray files, leading to a backlog. If your > clients are by any chance older kernel clients, you should upgrade > them. You can also unmount/remount them to clear this state, although > it will reoccur until the clients are updated (or until the bug is > fixed, if you're running latest clients already). > > The high level counters for strays are part of the default output of > "ceph daemonperf mds.<id>" when run on the MDS server (the "stry" and > "purg" columns). You can look at these to watch how fast the MDS is > clearing out strays. If your backlog is just because it's not doing > it fast enough, then you can look at tuning mds_max_purge_files and > mds_max_purge_ops to adjust the throttles on purging. Those settings > can be adjusted without restarting the MDS using the "injectargs" > command (http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/ > control/#mds-subsystem) > > Let us know how you get on. > > John > > > > The cluster state and storage available are both OK: > > > > cluster 98d72518-6619-4b5c-b148-9a781ef13bcb > > health HEALTH_WARN > > mds0: Client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failing to respond to cache > > pressure > > mds0: Client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failing to respond to cache > > pressure > > mds0: Client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failing to respond to cache > > pressure > > mds0: Client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failing to respond to cache > > pressure > > mds0: Client XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX failing to respond to cache > > pressure > > monmap e1: 1 mons at {000-s-ragnarok=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:6789/0} > > election epoch 11, quorum 0 000-s-ragnarok > > fsmap e62643: 1/1/1 up {0=000-s-ragnarok=up:active} > > osdmap e20203: 16 osds: 16 up, 16 in > > flags sortbitwise > > pgmap v15284654: 1088 pgs, 2 pools, 11263 GB data, 40801 kobjects > > 23048 GB used, 6745 GB / 29793 GB avail > > 1085 active+clean > > 2 active+clean+scrubbing > > 1 active+clean+scrubbing+deep > > > > > > Has anybody experienced this issue so far? > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Mykola > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > -- Mykola
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com