> Op 21 september 2016 om 17:23 schreef Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gmail.com>: > > > On 20 September 2016 at 19:27, Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > In librados getting a stat is basically equivalent to reading a small > > object; there's not an index or anything so FileStore needs to descend its > > folder hierarchy. If looking at metadata for all the objects in the system > > efficiently is important you'll want to layer an index in somewhere. > > -Greg > > > > Yeah, that's not particularly good to hear. Is this slowness also > inherent in list_nobjects too? It looks like I can iterate all > objects at a rate no faster than 25K per second. No chance at > speeding this up either by having two or more instances starting at > different pg offsets. >
RADOS has no index of objects. Everything is done using calculation. So when listing objects you basically have to go to each primary OSD for all PGs in a pool and ask them what objects are in the pool/PG. > For this particular operation, it's only looking for orphaned objects. > This wouldn't be needed if a mechanism for TTLs existed and set on all > objects. But that would mean finding out how RGW gets away with it, > and I assume with another very large index and actively keeping track > of all set destruction times. > RGW indeed keeps a index, but that limits it in the amount of objects you can store in a single bucket. Yes, bucket sharding helps, but the limit for a RGW bucket is still way lower then for a RADOS pool. Wido > -- > Iain Buclaw > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
