Hello, On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:28:50 -0500 shiva rkreddy wrote:
> By saying "old clients" did you mean, (a) Client VMs running old Operating > System (b) Client VMs/Volumes that are in-use for a long time and across > ceph releases ? Was there any tuning done to fix it? > I'm pretty sure he means c) that is: Clients (hosts) running older versions of Ceph. Which is a pretty common thing, both because the Ceph cluster operator may not be controlling all the clients, there are version dependencies from things like OpenStack, the Ceph version on the client was installed by using an OS distro package (usually well aged). What I'd like to know from Wido is if he opened a tracker issue for that, since this kind of regression should not happen [tm]. Christian > Thanks, > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > > > > > Op 12 september 2016 om 18:47 schreef "WRIGHT, JON R (JON R)" < > > jonrodwri...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Since upgrading to Jewel from Hammer, we're started to see HEALTH_WARN > > > because of 'blocked requests > 32 sec'. Seems to be related to writes. > > > > > > Has anyone else seen this? Or can anyone suggest what the problem might > > be? > > > > > > > Do you by any chance have old clients connecting? I saw this after a Jewel > > upgrade as well and it was because of very old clients still connecting to > > the cluster. > > > > Wido > > > > > Thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > > > > > Op 12 september 2016 om 18:47 schreef "WRIGHT, JON R (JON R)" < > > jonrodwri...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Since upgrading to Jewel from Hammer, we're started to see HEALTH_WARN > > > because of 'blocked requests > 32 sec'. Seems to be related to writes. > > > > > > Has anyone else seen this? Or can anyone suggest what the problem might > > be? > > > > > > > Do you by any chance have old clients connecting? I saw this after a Jewel > > upgrade as well and it was because of very old clients still connecting to > > the cluster. > > > > Wido > > > > > Thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer ch...@gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
