Thank Chengwei Yang. 2016-07-29 17:17 GMT+07:00 Chengwei Yang <chengwei.yang...@gmail.com>:
> Would http://ceph.com/pgcalc/ help? > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:27:38PM +0700, Khang Nguyễn Nhật wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a cluster consists of: 3 Monitors, 1 RGW, 1 host of 24 > OSDs(2TB/OSD) and > > some pool as: > > ap-southeast.rgw.data.root > > ap-southeast.rgw.control > > ap-southeast.rgw.gc > > ap-southeast.rgw.log > > ap-southeast.rgw.intent-log > > ap-southeast.rgw.usage > > ap-southeast.rgw.users.keys > > ap-southeast.rgw.users.email > > ap-southeast.rgw.users.swift > > ap-southeast.rgw.users.uid > > ap-southeast.rgw.buckets.index > > ap-southeast.rgw.buckets.data > > ap-southeast.rgw.buckets.non-ec > > ap-southeast.rgw.meta > > In which "ap-southeast.rgw.buckets.data" is a erasure pool(k=20, m=4) > and all > > of the remaining pool are replicated(size=3). I've used (100*OSDs)/size > to > > calculate the number of PGs, e.g. 100*24/3 = 800(nearest power of 2: > 1024) for > > replicated pools and 100*24/24=100(nearest power of 2: 128) for erasure > pool. > > I'm not sure this is the best placement group number, someone can give > me some > > advice ? > > Thank ! > > SECURITY NOTE: file ~/.netrc must not be accessible by others > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > -- > Thanks, > Chengwei >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
