Thanks, I can put in osds but the do not stay in, and I am pretty sure that are not broken.
Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 12:07 Oliver Dzombic < i...@ip-interactive.de> ha scritto: > hi, > > ceph osd set noscrub > ceph osd set nodeep-scrub > > ceph osd in <id> > > > -- > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards > > Oliver Dzombic > IP-Interactive > > mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de > > Anschrift: > > IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) > Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 > 63571 Gelnhausen > > HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau > Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic > > Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 > UST ID: DE274086107 > > > Am 29.06.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Mario Giammarco: > > Now the problem is that ceph has put out two disks because scrub has > > failed (I think it is not a disk fault but due to mark-complete) > > How can I: > > - disable scrub > > - put in again the two disks > > > > I will wait anyway the end of recovery to be sure it really works again > > > > Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 11:16 Mario Giammarco > > <mgiamma...@gmail.com <mailto:mgiamma...@gmail.com>> ha scritto: > > > > Infact I am worried because: > > > > 1) ceph is under proxmox, and proxmox may decide to reboot a server > > if it is not responding > > 2) probably a server was rebooted while ceph was reconstructing > > 3) even using max=3 do not help > > > > Anyway this is the "unofficial" procedure that I am using, much > > simpler than blog post: > > > > 1) find host where is pg > > 2) stop ceph in that host > > 3) ceph-objectstore-tool --pgid 1.98 --op mark-complete --data-path > > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-9 --journal-path > > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-9/journal > > 4) start ceph > > 5) look finally it reconstructing > > > > Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 11:11 Oliver Dzombic > > <i...@ip-interactive.de <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de>> ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > removing ONE disk while your replication is 2, is no problem. > > > > You dont need to wait a single second to replace of remove it. > Its > > anyway not used and out/down. So from ceph's point of view its > > not existent. > > > > ---------------- > > > > But as christian told you already, what we see now fits to a > > szenario > > where you lost the osd and eighter you did something, or > > something else > > happens, but the data were not recovered again. > > > > Eighter because another OSD was broken, or because you did > > something. > > > > Maybe, because of the "too many PGs per OSD (307 > max 300)" > > ceph never > > recovered. > > > > What i can see from http://pastebin.com/VZD7j2vN is that > > > > OSD 5,13,9,0,6,2,3 and maybe others, are the OSD's holding the > > incomplete data. > > > > This are 7 OSD's from 10. So something happend to that OSD's or > > the data > > in them. And that had nothing to do with a single disk failing. > > > > Something else must have been happend. > > > > And as christian already wrote: you will have to go through your > > logs > > back until the point were things going down. > > > > Because a fail of a single OSD, no matter what your replication > > size is, > > can ( normally ) not harm the consistency of 7 other OSD's, > > means 70% of > > your total cluster. > > > > -- > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards > > > > Oliver Dzombic > > IP-Interactive > > > > mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de> > > > > Anschrift: > > > > IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) > > Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 > > 63571 Gelnhausen > > > > HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau > > Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic > > > > Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 > > UST ID: DE274086107 > > > > > > Am 29.06.2016 um 10:56 schrieb Mario Giammarco: > > > Yes I have removed it from crush because it was broken. I have > > waited 24 > > > hours to see if cephs would like to heals itself. Then I > > removed the > > > disk completely (it was broken...) and I waited 24 hours > > again. Then I > > > start getting worried. > > > Are you saying to me that I should not remove a broken disk > from > > > cluster? 24 hours were not enough? > > > > > > Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 10:53 Zoltan Arnold Nagy > > > <zol...@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:zol...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > <mailto:zol...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > <mailto:zol...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>>> ha scritto: > > > > > > Just loosing one disk doesn’t automagically delete it from > > CRUSH, > > > but in the output you had 10 disks listed, so there must be > > > something else going - did you delete the disk from the > > crush map as > > > well? > > > > > > Ceph waits by default 300 secs AFAIK to mark an OSD out > > after it > > > will start to recover. > > > > > > > > >> On 29 Jun 2016, at 10:42, Mario Giammarco > > <mgiamma...@gmail.com <mailto:mgiamma...@gmail.com> > > >> <mailto:mgiamma...@gmail.com > > <mailto:mgiamma...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > >> > > >> I thank you for your reply so I can add my experience: > > >> > > >> 1) the other time this thing happened to me I had a > > cluster with > > >> min_size=2 and size=3 and the problem was the same. That > > time I > > >> put min_size=1 to recover the pool but it did not help. > > So I do > > >> not understand where is the advantage to put three copies > > when > > >> ceph can decide to discard all three. > > >> 2) I started with 11 hdds. The hard disk failed. Ceph > waited > > >> forever for hard disk coming back. But hard disk is really > > >> completelly broken so I have followed the procedure to > really > > >> delete from cluster. Anyway ceph did not recover. > > >> 3) I have 307 pgs more than 300 but it is due to the fact > > that I > > >> had 11 hdds now only 10. I will add more hdds after I > > repair the pool > > >> 4) I have reduced the monitors to 3 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Il giorno mer 29 giu 2016 alle ore 10:25 Christian Balzer > > >> <ch...@gol.com <mailto:ch...@gol.com> > > <mailto:ch...@gol.com <mailto:ch...@gol.com>>> ha scritto: > > >> > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:02:59 +0000 Mario Giammarco > wrote: > > >> > > >> > pool 0 'rbd' replicated size 2 min_size 1 > > crush_ruleset 0 > > >> object_hash > > >> ^ > > >> And that's the root cause of all your woes. > > >> The default replication size is 3 for a reason and > > while I do > > >> run pools > > >> with replication of 2 they are either HDD RAIDs or > > extremely > > >> trustworthy > > >> and well monitored SSD. > > >> > > >> That said, something more than a single HDD failure > > must have > > >> happened > > >> here, you should check the logs and backtrace all the > > step you > > >> did after > > >> that OSD failed. > > >> > > >> You said there were 11 HDDs and your first ceph -s > > output showed: > > >> --- > > >> osdmap e10182: 10 osds: 10 up, 10 in > > >> ---- > > >> And your crush map states the same. > > >> > > >> So how and WHEN did you remove that OSD? > > >> My suspicion would be it was removed before recovery > > was complete. > > >> > > >> Also, as I think was mentioned before, 7 mons are > > overkill 3-5 > > >> would be a > > >> saner number. > > >> > > >> Christian > > >> > > >> > rjenkins pg_num 512 pgp_num 512 last_change 9313 > flags > > >> hashpspool > > >> > stripe_width 0 > > >> > removed_snaps [1~3] > > >> > pool 1 'rbd2' replicated size 2 min_size 1 > > crush_ruleset 0 > > >> object_hash > > >> > rjenkins pg_num 512 pgp_num 512 last_change 9314 > flags > > >> hashpspool > > >> > stripe_width 0 > > >> > removed_snaps [1~3] > > >> > pool 2 'rbd3' replicated size 2 min_size 1 > > crush_ruleset 0 > > >> object_hash > > >> > rjenkins pg_num 512 pgp_num 512 last_change 10537 > flags > > >> hashpspool > > >> > stripe_width 0 > > >> > removed_snaps [1~3] > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR > > >> > 5 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 984G 872G 53.00 0.86 > > >> > 6 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 1202G 655G 64.73 1.05 > > >> > 2 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 1158G 698G 62.38 1.01 > > >> > 3 1.35999 1.00000 1391G 906G 485G 65.12 1.06 > > >> > 4 0.89999 1.00000 926G 702G 223G 75.88 1.23 > > >> > 7 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 1063G 793G 57.27 0.93 > > >> > 8 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 1011G 846G 54.44 0.88 > > >> > 9 0.89999 1.00000 926G 573G 352G 61.91 1.01 > > >> > 0 1.81000 1.00000 1857G 1227G 629G 66.10 1.07 > > >> > 13 0.45000 1.00000 460G 307G 153G 66.74 1.08 > > >> > TOTAL 14846G 9136G 5710G 61.54 > > >> > MIN/MAX VAR: 0.86/1.23 STDDEV: 6.47 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ceph version 0.94.7 > > (d56bdf93ced6b80b07397d57e3fa68fe68304432) > > >> > > > >> > http://pastebin.com/SvGfcSHb > > >> > http://pastebin.com/gYFatsNS > > >> > http://pastebin.com/VZD7j2vN > > >> > > > >> > I do not understand why I/O on ENTIRE cluster is > > blocked > > >> when only few > > >> > pgs are incomplete. > > >> > > > >> > Many thanks, > > >> > Mario > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Il giorno mar 28 giu 2016 alle ore 19:34 Stefan > > Priebe - > > >> Profihost AG < > > >> > s.pri...@profihost.ag > > <mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag> <mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag > > <mailto:s.pri...@profihost.ag>>> ha > > >> scritto: > > >> > > > >> > > And ceph health detail > > >> > > > > >> > > Stefan > > >> > > > > >> > > Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone. > > >> > > > > >> > > Am 28.06.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Oliver Dzombic > > >> <i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de> <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de>>>: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Mario, > > >> > > > > >> > > please give some more details: > > >> > > > > >> > > Please the output of: > > >> > > > > >> > > ceph osd pool ls detail > > >> > > ceph osd df > > >> > > ceph --version > > >> > > > > >> > > ceph -w for 10 seconds ( use http://pastebin.com/ > > please ) > > >> > > > > >> > > ceph osd crush dump ( also pastebin pls ) > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards > > >> > > > > >> > > Oliver Dzombic > > >> > > IP-Interactive > > >> > > > > >> > > mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de> > > >> <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de>> <i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de> > > >> <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de > > <mailto:i...@ip-interactive.de>>> > > >> > > > > >> > > Anschrift: > > >> > > > > >> > > IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) > > >> > > Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 > > >> > > 63571 Gelnhausen > > >> > > > > >> > > HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau > > >> > > Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic > > >> > > > > >> > > Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 > > >> > > UST ID: DE274086107 > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Am 28.06.2016 um 18:59 schrieb Mario Giammarco: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hello, > > >> > > > > >> > > this is the second time that happens to me, I > > hope that > > >> someone can > > >> > > > > >> > > explain what I can do. > > >> > > > > >> > > Proxmox ceph cluster with 8 servers, 11 hdd. > > Min_size=1, > > >> size=2. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > One hdd goes down due to bad sectors. > > >> > > > > >> > > Ceph recovers but it ends with: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > cluster f2a8dd7d-949a-4a29-acab-11d4900249f4 > > >> > > > > >> > > health HEALTH_WARN > > >> > > > > >> > > 3 pgs down > > >> > > > > >> > > 19 pgs incomplete > > >> > > > > >> > > 19 pgs stuck inactive > > >> > > > > >> > > 19 pgs stuck unclean > > >> > > > > >> > > 7 requests are blocked > 32 sec > > >> > > > > >> > > monmap e11: 7 mons at > > >> > > > > >> > > {0=192.168.0.204:6789/0,1=192.168.0.201:6789/0 > > <http://192.168.0.204:6789/0,1=192.168.0.201:6789/0> > > >> <http://192.168.0.204:6789/0,1=192.168.0.201:6789/0>, > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 2=192.168.0.203:6789/0,3=192.168.0.205:6789/0,4=192.168.0.202 > > < > http://192.168.0.203:6789/0,3=192.168.0.205:6789/0,4=192.168.0.202> > > >> > > < > http://192.168.0.203:6789/0,3=192.168.0.205:6789/0,4=192.168.0.202>: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 6789/0,5=192.168.0.206:6789/0,6=192.168.0.207:6789/0 > > <http://192.168.0.206:6789/0,6=192.168.0.207:6789/0> > > >> <http://192.168.0.206:6789/0,6=192.168.0.207:6789/0>} > > >> > > > > >> > > election epoch 722, quorum > > >> > > > > >> > > 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 1,4,2,0,3,5,6 > > >> > > > > >> > > osdmap e10182: 10 osds: 10 up, 10 in > > >> > > > > >> > > pgmap v3295880: 1024 pgs, 2 pools, 4563 GB > > data, 1143 > > >> kobjects > > >> > > > > >> > > 9136 GB used, 5710 GB / 14846 GB avail > > >> > > > > >> > > 1005 active+clean > > >> > > > > >> > > 16 incomplete > > >> > > > > >> > > 3 down+incomplete > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Unfortunately "7 requests blocked" means no > virtual > > >> machine can boot > > >> > > > > >> > > because ceph has stopped i/o. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I can accept to lose some data, but not ALL data! > > >> > > > > >> > > Can you help me please? > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > >> > > Mario > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > > > >> > > ceph-users mailing list > > >> > > > > >> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > ceph-users mailing list > > >> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> > > >> > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >> > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > ceph-users mailing list > > >> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> > > >> > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > > >> ch...@gol.com <mailto:ch...@gol.com> > > <mailto:ch...@gol.com <mailto:ch...@gol.com>> Global > > OnLine > > >> Japan/Rakuten Communications > > >> http://www.gol.com/ > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> ceph-users mailing list > > >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>> > > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
