Sorry, I should have been more clear.  The bug actually is due to a
difference in an on disk encoding from hammer.  An infernalis cluster would
never had had such encodings and is fine.
-Sam
On Jun 3, 2016 6:53 AM, "Francois Lafont" <flafdiv...@free.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 03/06/2016 05:39, Samuel Just wrote:
>
> > Due to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16113, it would be best to avoid
> > setting the sortbitwise flag on jewel clusters upgraded from previous
> > versions until we get a point release out with a fix.
> >
> > The symptom is that setting the sortbitwise flag on a jewel cluster
> > upgraded from a previous version can result in some pgs reporting
> > spurious unfound objects.  Unsetting sortbitwise should cause the PGs
> > to go back to normal.  Clusters created at jewel don't need to worry
> > about this.
>
> Now, I have an Infernalis cluster in production. It's an Infernalis cluster
> installed from scratch (not from an upgrade). I intend to upgrade the
> cluster to Jewel. Indeed, I have noticed that the flag "sortbitwise" was
> set by default in my Infernalis cluster. By the way, I don't know exactly
> the meaning of this flag but the cluster is HEALTH_OK with this flag set
> by default so I have not changed it.
>
> If I have well understood, to upgrade my Infernalis cluster, I have 2
> options:
>
> a) I unset the flag "sortbitwise" via "ceph osd unset sortbitwise", then
> I upgrade the cluster to Jewel 10.2.1 and in the next release of Jewel
> (I guess 10.2.2) I could set again the flag via "ceph osd set sortbitwise".
>
> b) Or I just wait for the next release of Jewel (10.2.2) without worrying
> about the flag "sortbitwise".
>
> 1. Is it correct?
> 2. Can we have data movement when we toggle the flag "sortbitwise"?
>
> --
> François Lafont
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to