On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Tyler Wilson <k...@linuxdigital.net> wrote:
> $ rbd diff backup/cd4e5d37-3023-4640-be5a-5577d3f9307e | awk '{ SUM += $2 }
> END { print SUM/1024/1024 " MB" }'
> 49345.4 MBIs this a cloned image? That awk trick doesn't account for discarded regions (i.e. when column three says "zero" instead of "data"). Does the number change when you pipe the "rbd diff" results through "grep data" before piping to awk? > Could this be affected by replica counts some how? It seems to be twice as > large as what is reported in the filesystem which matches my replica count. No, the "rbd diff" output is only reporting image data and zeroed extents -- so the replication factor is not included. -- Jason _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
