Very good points w.r.t. easing migration. There is no plan to remove support for image format 1 -- it's more about being able to concentrate our attention to format 2 and to nudge users towards creating new images in format 2.
-- Jason Dillaman ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christian Balzer" <ch...@gol.com> > To: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > Cc: "Jason Dillaman" <dilla...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:05:40 PM > Subject: Image format support (Was: Re: [ceph-users] Scrubbing a lot) > > > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:15:00 -0400 (EDT) Jason Dillaman wrote: > > > Image format 1 is still supported -- just trying to slowly move users > > off of it and onto image format 2 through lots of log message nagging. > > > > Until there is a "live" migration or something as close to it as possible, > don't expect anybody who doesn't need format 2 features (like me in our > largest use case) to make that change. > > Excessive down time, massive data movement, loss of sparse allocation if > you're not careful are all factors against migration to format 2. > > Regards, > > Christian > -- > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > ch...@gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications > http://www.gol.com/ > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
