Neither of these file systems is recommended for production use underlying an OSD. The general direction for ceph is to move away from having a file system at all.
That effort is called "bluestore" and is supposed to show up in the jewel release. -H > On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:15, Schlacta, Christ <aarc...@aarcane.org> wrote: > > Insofar as I've been able to tell, both BTRFS and ZFS provide similar > capabilities back to CEPH, and both are sufficiently stable for the > basic CEPH use case (Single disk -> single mount point), so the > question becomes this: Which actually provides better performance? > Which is the more highly optimized single write path for ceph? Does > anybody have a handful of side-by-side benchmarks? I'm more > interested in higher IOPS, since you can always scale-out throughput, > but throughput is also important. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
