On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Adam Tygart <mo...@ksu.edu> wrote: > The docs are already split by version, although it doesn't help that > it isn't linked in an obvious manner. > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/
Is there any reason to keep this "master" (version-less variant) given how much confusion it causes? I think I noticed the version split one time back but it didn't lodge in my mind, and when I looked for something today I hit the "master" and there were no hits for the version (which I should have been looking at). I'd be glad to contribute to the documentation effort. For example I would like to be able to ask questions around the terminology that is scattered through the documentation that I think needs better explanation. I'm not sure if pull-requests that try to annotate what is there would mean some parts would become a wall of text whereas the explanation would be better suited as a (more informal) comment-thread at the bottom of the page that can be browsed (mainly by beginners trying to navigate an unfamiliar architecture). _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
