Hello, I have 2 pools as below: 1. pool1 with erasure type 2. pool2 with replicated type
I ran the "rados bench" with above 2 pool and the results came as below: - Read performance - around 60% better for replicated type pool ie pool2 - Write performance - around 50 % better for erasure type pool ie pool1. Can someone help me, if the above is correct behavior with ceph? Or do I miss something here? Thanks Swami _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
