Yeah, the write proxying is pretty new and the fact that it's missing from an oddball like READFORWARD isn't surprising. (Not good, exactly, but not surprising.) What are you doing with this caching mode?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote: > Don’t know why that URL got changed, it was meant to link to > ReplicatedPG.cc - line 2192 > > > > *From:* ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] *On Behalf > Of *Nick Fisk > *Sent:* 19 November 2015 16:29 > *To:* 'ceph-users' <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> > *Subject:* [ceph-users] CACHEMODE_READFORWARD doesn't try proxy write? > > > > Hi, > > > > I’m just looking through > > > > > http://xo4t.mj.am/link/xo4t/q9huhtz/1/4rVziiaGv2W3GR2w1KXhAQ/aHR0cDovL3hvNHQubWouYW0vbGluay94bzR0L3E5aDQ0d3EvMS9ndzIzYmtIUENUYXpBb0k2b1JMX25nL2FIUjBjSE02THk5bmFYUm9kV0l1WTI5dEwyTmxjR2d2WTJWd2FDOWliRzlpTDJWbU1tWmxZemM0TkRRd1lUVXlNamN5TW1Ga01EQXpaakF6T1RsaVkyWmxZekk0TURnME1UWXZjM0pqTDI5elpDOVNaWEJzYVdOaGRHVmtVRWN1WTJN#L2192 > > > > And from what I can see if you set the cachemode to CACHEMODE_READFORWARD, > proxy writes will not be used. Am I reading the code correct and is that > the desired behaviour? I would have thought you would still expect proxy > writes to occur but just disable the promotion of reads? I believe this is > also the case for CACHEMODE_READPROXY. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
