Hmm, so apparently a similar bug was fixed in 0.87: Scott, can you confirm
that your *clients* were 0.94 (not just the servers)?

Thanks,
John

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:56 AM, John Spray <jsp...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Ah, this is a nice clear log!
>
> I've described the bug here:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13271
>
> In the short term, you may be able to mitigate this by increasing
> client_cache_size (on the client) if your RAM allows it.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I know this is an old one but I got a log in ceph-fuse for it.
>> I got this on OpenSuse 12.1
>> 3.1.10-1.29-desktop
>>
>> Using ceph-fuse
>> ceph version 0.94.3 (95cefea9fd9ab740263bf8bb4796fd864d9afe2b)
>>
>> I am running an rsync in the background and then doing a simple ls -la so
>> the log is large.
>>
>> I am guessing this is the problem. The file is there and if I list the
>> directory again it shows up properly.
>>
>> 2015-09-28 16:34:21.548631 7f372effd700  3 client.28239198 ll_lookup
>> 0x7f370d1b1c50 data.2015-08-23_00-00-00.csv.bz2
>> 2015-09-28 16:34:21.548635 7f372effd700 10 client.28239198 _lookup
>> concluded ENOENT locally for 100009d72a1.head(ref=4 ll_ref=5 cap_refs={}
>> open={} mode=42775 size=0/0 mtime=2015-09-28 05:57:57.259306
>> caps=pAsLsXsFs(0=pAsLsXsFs) COMPLETE parents=0x7f3732ff97c0 0x7f370d1b1c50)
>> dn 'data.2015-08-23_00-00-00.csv.bz2'
>>
>>
>> [image: Selection_034.png]
>>
>> It seems to show up more if multiple things are access the ceph mount,
>> just my observations.
>>
>> Best,
>> Scott
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:05 PM Scottix <scot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ya we are not at 0.87.1 yet, possibly tomorrow. I'll let you know if it
>>> still reports the same.
>>>
>>> Thanks John,
>>> --Scottie
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:57 PM John Spray <john.sp...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03/03/2015 22:35, Scottix wrote:
>>>> > I was testing a little bit more and decided to run the
>>>> cephfs-journal-tool
>>>> >
>>>> > I ran across some errors
>>>> >
>>>> > $ cephfs-journal-tool journal inspect
>>>> > 2015-03-03 14:18:54.453981 7f8e29f86780 -1 Bad entry start ptr
>>>> > (0x2aeb0000f6) at 0x2aeb32279b
>>>> > 2015-03-03 14:18:54.539060 7f8e29f86780 -1 Bad entry start ptr
>>>> > (0x2aeb000733) at 0x2aeb322dd8
>>>> > 2015-03-03 14:18:54.584539 7f8e29f86780 -1 Bad entry start ptr
>>>> > (0x2aeb000d70) at 0x2aeb323415
>>>> > 2015-03-03 14:18:54.669991 7f8e29f86780 -1 Bad entry start ptr
>>>> > (0x2aeb0013ad) at 0x2aeb323a52
>>>> > 2015-03-03 14:18:54.707724 7f8e29f86780 -1 Bad entry start ptr
>>>> > (0x2aeb0019ea) at 0x2aeb32408f
>>>> > Overall journal integrity: DAMAGED
>>>>
>>>> I expect this is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9977, which is fixed in
>>>> master.
>>>>
>>>> You are in *very* bleeding edge territory here, and I'd suggest using
>>>> the latest development release if you want to experiment with the latest
>>>> CephFS tooling.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to