Just to be clear, there's no longer going to be a generic http://downloads.ceph.com/debian (sans -{ceph-release-name}) path? In other words, we'll have to monitor something else to determine what's considered stable for our {distro-release} and then update the sources to point at a new debian-{ceph-release-name} ourselves, correct?
Thanks, Brian On Fri, Sep 18, 2015, 09:45 Alfredo Deza <ad...@redhat.com> wrote: > The new locations are in: > > > http://packages.ceph.com/ > > For debian this would be: > > http://packages.ceph.com/debian-{release} > > Note that ceph-extras is no longer available: the current repos should > provide everything/anything that is needed to properly install > ceph. Otherwise, please let us know . > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmm, apparently I haven't gotten that far in my email backlog yet. > That's > > good to know too. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > Olivier Bonvalet <ceph.l...@daevel.fr> 2015-09-18 16:02: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> not sure if it's related, but there is recent changes because of a > >> security issue : > >> > >> > >> > http://ceph.com/releases/important-security-notice-regarding-signing-key-and-binary-downloads-of-ceph/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Le vendredi 18 septembre 2015 à 08:45 -0500, Brian Kroth a écrit : > >>> > >>> Hi all, we've had the following in our > >>> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list > >>> for a while based on some previous docs, > >>> > >>> # ceph upstream stable (currently giant) release packages for wheezy: > >>> deb http://ceph.com/debian/ wheezy main > >>> > >>> # ceph extras: > >>> deb http://ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras/debian wheezy main > >>> > >>> but it seems like the straight "debian/" portion of that path has > >>> gone > >>> missing recently, and now there's only debian-firefly/, debian > >>> -giant/, > >>> debian-hammer/, etc. > >>> > >>> Is that just an oversight, or should we be switching our sources to > >>> one > >>> of the named releases? I figured that the unnamed one would > >>> automatically track what ceph currently considered "stable" for the > >>> target distro release for me, but maybe that's not the case. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Brian > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> ceph-users mailing list > >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
