Hi ,

We got a good deal on 843T and we are using it in our Openstack setup ..as
journals .
They have been running for last six months ... No issues .
When we compared with  Intel SSDs I think it was 3700 they  were shade
slower for our workload and considerably cheaper.
We did not run any synthetic benchmark since we had a specific use case.
The performance was better than our old setup so it was good enough.

hth



On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We have some 850 pro 256gb ssds if anyone interested to buy:)
>
> And also there was new 850 pro firmware that broke peoples disk which was
> revoked later etc... I'm sticking with only vacuum cleaners from Samsung
> for now, maybe... :)
> On Aug 25, 2015 12:02 PM, "Voloshanenko Igor" <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> To be honest, Samsung 850 PRO not 24/7 series... it's something about
>> desktop+ series, but anyway - results from this drives - very very bad in
>> any scenario acceptable by real life...
>>
>> Possible 845 PRO more better, but we don't want to experiment anymore...
>> So we choose S3500 240G. Yes, it's cheaper than S3700 (about 2x times), and
>> no so durable for writes, but we think more better to replace 1 ssd per 1
>> year than to pay double price now.
>>
>> 2015-08-25 12:59 GMT+03:00 Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> And should I mention that in another CEPH installation we had samsung
>>> 850 pro 128GB and all of 6 ssds died in 2 month period - simply disappear
>>> from the system, so not wear out...
>>>
>>> Never again we buy Samsung :)
>>> On Aug 25, 2015 11:57 AM, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> First read please:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
>>>>
>>>> We are getting 200 IOPS in comparison to Intels3500 18.000 iops - those
>>>> are  constant performance numbers, meaning avoiding drives cache and
>>>> running for longer period of time...
>>>> Also if checking with FIO you will get better latencies on intel s3500
>>>> (model tested in our case) along with 20X better IOPS results...
>>>>
>>>> We observed original issue by having high speed at begining of i.e.
>>>> file transfer inside VM, which than halts to zero... We moved journals back
>>>> to HDDs and performans was acceptable...no we are upgrading to intel
>>>> S3500...
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> any details on that ?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:42:47 +0200, Andrija Panic
>>>> <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Make sure you test what ever you decide. We just learned this the
>>>> hard way
>>>> > with samsung 850 pro, which is total crap, more than you could
>>>> imagine...
>>>> >
>>>> > Andrija
>>>> > On Aug 25, 2015 11:25 AM, "Jan Schermer" <j...@schermer.cz> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I would recommend Samsung 845 DC PRO (not EVO, not just PRO).
>>>> > > Very cheap, better than Intel 3610 for sure (and I think it beats
>>>> even
>>>> > > 3700).
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Jan
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > On 25 Aug 2015, at 11:23, Christopher Kunz <chrisl...@de-punkt.de
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Am 25.08.15 um 11:18 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator:
>>>> > > >> Hi,
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> most of the times I do get the recommendation from resellers to
>>>> go with
>>>> > > >> the intel s3700 for the journalling.
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > > Check out the Intel s3610. 3 drive writes per day for 5 years.
>>>> Plus, it
>>>> > > > is cheaper than S3700.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Regards,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --ck
>>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > > ceph-users mailing list
>>>> > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>> > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > ceph-users mailing list
>>>> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator
>>>>
>>>> Efigence S. A.
>>>> ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa
>>>> T: [+48] 22 380 13 13
>>>> F: [+48] 22 380 13 14
>>>> E: mariusz.gronczew...@efigence.com
>>>> <mailto:mariusz.gronczew...@efigence.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to