Oh, now I've to cry :-) not because it's not SSDs... it's SAS2 HDDs Because, I need to build something for 140 clients... 4200 OSDs
:-( Looks like, I can pickup my performance by SSDs, but I need a huge capacity ~ 2PB Perhaps, tiering cache pool can save my money, but I've read here - that it's slower than all people think... :-( Why Lustre is more performable? There're same HDDs? ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
