The biggest downside that I've found is the log volume that mons create
eats a lot of io. I was running mons on my OSDs previously, but in my
current dpeloyment I've moved them to other hardware and noticed a
perceptible load reduction on those nodes that were formerly running mons.

QH

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Lazuardi Nasution <mrxlazuar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for pros and cons of combining MON and OSD functionality on
> the same nodes. Mostly recommended configuration is to have dedicated, odd
> number MON nodes. What I'm thinking is more like single node deployment but
> consist more than one node, if we have 3 nodes we have 3 MONs with 3 OSDs.
> Since MON will only consume small resources, I think MON load will not
> degrade OSD performance significantly. If we have odd number of nodes, we
> can still maintain the quorum of MON with this way. Any idea?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to