Robert,

I did try scrubbing and deep-scrubbing - it seems the OSD is ignoring
deep-scrub and scrub commands for the PG (I imagine because the state does
not include "active".)

However, I came across this blog post last night and am currently pursuing:
https://ceph.com/community/incomplete-pgs-oh-my/

Thanks,
-Aaron

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Robert LeBlanc <rob...@leblancnet.us>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Did you try to deep-scrub the PG after copying it to 29?
> - ----------------
> Robert LeBlanc
> GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Aaron Ten Clay  wrote:
> > Hi Cephers,
> >
> > I recently had a power problem and the entire cluster was brought down,
> came
> > up, went down, and came up again. Afterword, 3 OSDs were mostly dead (HDD
> > failures). Luckily (I think) the drives were alive enough that I could
> copy
> > the data off and leave the journal alone.
> >
> > Since my pool "data" size is 3... of course a couple of placement groups
> > were only on those three drives.
> >
> > Now I've added 4 new OSDs, and everything has recovered, except pg 0.f3.
> > When I query the pg, I see the cluster is looking for OSD 14 or 23
> because
> > one of them maybe_went_rw. (5, 14, and 23 are now kaput and "ceph osd
> lost
> > --yes-i-really-mean-it")
> >
> > Ceph indicates OSD 29 is now the primary for pg 0.f3. I copied all the
> data
> > to the appropriate directory, started OSD.29 again, and here is where my
> > question comes in:
> >
> > How do I convince the cluster that it's okay to bring 0.f3 'up' and
> backfill
> > to the other OSDs from 29? (I could even manually backfill 15 and 22,
> but I
> > suspect the cluster will still think there's a problem)
> >
> > 'ceph health detail' shows this about 0.f3:
> > pg 0.f3 is incomplete, acting [29,22,15] (reducing pool data min_size
> from 2
> > may help; search ceph.com/docs for 'incomplete')
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > -Aaron
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
>
> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVcee3CRDmVDuy+mK58QAA0g4QAIGmDnQcR2LtMr9YqJfz
> mUwC1ZN35WCzFn8varbTcJZqW0MEHQZ3vP6EqWcoPqQhc6ehHi8+onjTTmDf
> 1CLMAyqxh/rRglqYP9EnWXdzMmOaQCDC5ImOLD79tvjxDAsRZ1TPwtPWsj3S
> CxaitKF13dot31AftUjTUsZ8eTjNyCT1VIQJVEiHxVtgQfOlEGNaQnYDZ955
> eJKsKTBoTlU1nZe0jKCefac8ZgJ32ngGu4KGyfUEx4MQsRWx0Uv9+71OiTJ4
> E3mxxtR1OBhcbAK6syqm1sh8ELa8fMOBTZzC9nauYpYfhvnW5yk5PmDrUdri
> gGoQozqspIPmaa9fXjO5Q8+L86mhG69CnlRU7zD2frzLp6RCT6dWQhhTuHt5
> oPWbdoY6dWY93nJPjGo3Dh4WnFR1SAezn1STOI1rtIQGu+uvD5Joc/6QUuUS
> R9mSC3XycUX1YfGGetsaz1PZhBV0CEytrnOh22CM907luvSubXyd5Hrddu3p
> zNQ1xUz5IFsaDPWgk27k3vY98CfZy+EJJ7fJvlC6gU6NHX0Y7YrU6kzGauiQ
> 0NKMfjjSsaxaPnHKtPbQ8OkX4j1hvXsgHKsClLNaVQHvQFlSB5rScQZ7rmYV
> I/UWxhIz70q467J0eA0+kCqTsTEw6VJ62bdoWrd2MkAwd4WpRCA/VtK73B6+
> 9ByE
> =ODgo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to