You can also just fetch the rhev SRPMs  and build those. They have rbd
enabled already.
On May 19, 2015 12:31 PM, "Robert LeBlanc" <rob...@leblancnet.us> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> You should be able to get the SRPM, extract the SPEC file and use that
> to build a new package. You should be able to tweak all the compile
> options as well. I'm still really new to building/rebuilding RPMs but
> I've been able to do this for a couple of packages.
> - ----------------
> Robert LeBlanc
> GPG Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis  wrote:
> > I am trying to build the packages manually and I was wondering
> > is the flag --enable-rbd enough to have full Ceph functionality?
> >
> > Does anybody know what else flags should I include in order to have the
> same
> > functionality as the original CentOS package plus the RBD support?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 19 May 2015 13:45:50 +0300, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> The QEMU Venom vulnerability (http://venom.crowdstrike.com/) got my
> >> attention and I would
> >> like to know what are you people doing in order to have the latest
> >> patched QEMU version
> >> working with Ceph RBD?
> >>
> >> In my case I am using the qemu-img and qemu-kvm packages provided by
> >> Ceph (http://ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras/rpm/centos6/x86_64/) in
> >> order to have RBD working on CentOS6 since the default repository
> >> packages do not work!
> >>
> >> If I want to update to the latest QEMU packages which ones are known
> >> to work with Ceph RBD?
> >> I have seen some people mentioning that Fedora packages are working
> >> but I am not sure if they have the latest packages available and if
> >> they are going to work eventually.
> >>
> >> Is building manually the QEMU packages the only way???
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> George
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ceph-users mailing list
> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1
> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
>
> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVW4+RCRDmVDuy+mK58QAAg8AP/jqmQFYEwOeGRTJigk9M
> pBhr34vyA3mky+BjjW9pt2tydECOH0p5PlYXBfhrQeg2B/yT0uVUKYbYkdBU
> fY85UhS5NFdm7VyFyMPSGQwZlXIADF8YJw+Zbj1tpfRvbCi/sntbvGQk+9X8
> usVSwBTbWKhYyMW8J5edppv72fMwoVjmoNXuE7wCUoqwxpQBUt0ouap6gDNd
> Cu0ZMu+RKq+gfLGcIeSIhsDfV0/LHm2QBO/XjNZtMjyomOWNk9nYHp6HGJxH
> MV/EoF4dYoCqHcODPjU2NvesQfYkmqfFoq/n9q/fMEV5JQ+mDfXqc2BcQUsx
> 40LDWDs+4BTw0KI+dNT0XUYTw+O0WnXFzgIn1wqXEs8pyOSJy1gCcnOGEavy
> 4PqYasm1g+5uzggaIddFPcWHJTw5FuFfjCnHX8Jo3EeQVDM6Vg8FPkkb5JQk
> sqxVRQWsF89gGRUbHIQWdkgy3PZN0oTkBvUfflmE/cUq/r40sD4c25D+9Gti
> Gj0IKG5uqMaHud3Hln++0ai5roOghoK0KxcDoBTmFLaQSNo9c4CIFCDf2kJ3
> idH5tVozDSgvFpgBFLFatb7isctIYf4Luh/XpLXUzdjklGGzo9mhOjXsbm56
> WCJZOkQ/OY1UFysMV5+tSSEn7TsF7Np9NagZB7AHhYuTKlOnbv3QJlhATOPp
> u4wP
> =SsM2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to