Hi,

small update:

in 3 months - we lost 5 out of 6 Samsung 128Gb 850 PROs (just few days in
between of each SSD death) - cant believe it - NOT due to wearing out... I
really hope we got efective series from suplier...

Regards

On 18 April 2015 at 14:24, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes I know, but to late now, I'm afraid :)
>
> On 18 April 2015 at 14:18, Josef Johansson <jose...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have you looked into the samsung 845 dc? They are not that expensive last
>> time I checked.
>>
>> /Josef
>> On 18 Apr 2015 13:15, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> might be true, yes - we had Intel 128GB (intel S3500 or S3700) - but
>>> these have horrible random/sequetial speeds - Samsun 850 PROs are 3 times
>>> at least faster on sequential, and more than 3 times faser on random/IOPS
>>> measures.
>>> And ofcourse modern enterprise drives = $$$$...
>>>
>>> On 18 April 2015 at 12:42, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, it sure is - my experience with 'consumer' SSD is that they die
>>>> with obscure firmware bugs (wrong capacity, zero capacity, not detected in
>>>> bios anymore) rather than flash wearout. It seems that the 'enterprise'
>>>> tagged drives are less inclined to suffer this fate.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> On 18/04/15 22:23, Andrija Panic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> these 2 drives, are on the regular SATA (on board)controler, and beside
>>>>> this, there is 12 x 4TB on the fron of the servers - normal backplane
>>>>> on
>>>>> the front.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, we are going to check those dead SSDs on a pc/laptop or so,just
>>>>> to confirm they are really dead - but this is the way they die, not
>>>>> wear
>>>>> out, but simply show different space instead of real one - thse were 3
>>>>> months old only when they died...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18 April 2015 at 11:55, Josef Johansson <jose...@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:jose...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     If the same chassi/chip/backplane is behind both drives and maybe
>>>>>     other drives in the chassi have troubles,it may be a defect there
>>>>> as
>>>>>     well.
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 18 Apr 2015 09:42, "Steffen W Sørensen" <ste...@me.com
>>>>>     <mailto:ste...@me.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          > On 17/04/2015, at 21.07, Andrija Panic
>>>>>         <andrija.pa...@gmail.com <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>          >
>>>>>          > nah....Samsun 850 PRO 128GB - dead after 3months - 2 of
>>>>> these
>>>>>         died... wearing level is 96%, so only 4% wasted... (yes I know
>>>>>         these are not enterprise,etc… )
>>>>>         Damn… but maybe your surname says it all - Don’t Panic :) But
>>>>>         making sure same type of SSD devices ain’t of near same age and
>>>>>         doing preventive replacement rotation might be good practice I
>>>>>         guess.
>>>>>
>>>>>         /Steffen
>>>>>
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>         ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>>>>>         http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrija Panić
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Andrija Panić
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to