Is jemalloc recommanded in general? Does it also work for firefly? Stefan
Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone. > Am 24.04.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER <aderum...@odiso.com>: > > Hi, > > I have finished to rebuild ceph with jemalloc, > > all seem to working fine. > > I got a constant 300k iops for the moment, so no speed regression. > > I'll do more long benchmark next week. > > Regards, > > Alexandre > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Irek Fasikhov" <malm...@gmail.com> > À: "Somnath Roy" <somnath....@sandisk.com> > Cc: "aderumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "Mark Nelson" <mnel...@redhat.com>, > "ceph-users" <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>, "ceph-devel" > <ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org>, "Milosz Tanski" <mil...@adfin.com> > Envoyé: Vendredi 24 Avril 2015 13:37:52 > Objet: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd daemon > improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops > > Hi,Alexandre! > Do not try to change the parameter vm.min_free_kbytes? > > 2015-04-23 19:24 GMT+03:00 Somnath Roy < somnath....@sandisk.com > : > > > Alexandre, > You can configure with --with-jemalloc or ./do_autogen -J to build ceph with > jemalloc. > > Thanks & Regards > Somnath > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-users [mailto: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com ] On Behalf Of > Alexandre DERUMIER > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:56 AM > To: Mark Nelson > Cc: ceph-users; ceph-devel; Milosz Tanski > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd daemon > improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops > >>> If you have the means to compile the same version of ceph with >>> jemalloc, I would be very interested to see how it does. > > Yes, sure. (I have around 3-4 weeks to do all the benchs) > > But I don't know how to do it ? > I'm running the cluster on centos7.1, maybe it can be easy to patch the srpms > to rebuild the package with jemalloc. > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Mark Nelson" < mnel...@redhat.com > > À: "aderumier" < aderum...@odiso.com >, "Srinivasula Maram" < > srinivasula.ma...@sandisk.com > > Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >, "ceph-devel" < > ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "Milosz Tanski" < mil...@adfin.com > > Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Avril 2015 13:33:00 > Objet: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd daemon > improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops > > Thanks for the testing Alexandre! > > If you have the means to compile the same version of ceph with jemalloc, I > would be very interested to see how it does. > > In some ways I'm glad it turned out not to be NUMA. I still suspect we will > have to deal with it at some point, but perhaps not today. ;) > > Mark > >> On 04/23/2015 05:58 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: >> Maybe it's tcmalloc related >> I thinked to have patched it correctly, but perf show a lot of >> tcmalloc::ThreadCache::ReleaseToCentralCache >> >> before osd restart (100k) >> ------------------ >> 11.66% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] >> tcmalloc::ThreadCache::ReleaseToCentralCache >> 8.51% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] >> tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromSpans >> 3.04% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] >> tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::ReleaseToSpans >> 2.04% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] operator new 1.63% swapper >> [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 1.35% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 >> [.] tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::ReleaseListToSpans >> 1.33% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] operator delete 1.07% ceph-osd >> libstdc++.so.6.0.19 [.] std::basic_string<char, >> std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string 0.91% >> ceph-osd libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_trylock 0.88% ceph-osd >> libc-2.17.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back 0.81% ceph-osd ceph-osd [.] >> Mutex::Lock 0.79% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> copy_user_enhanced_fast_string 0.74% ceph-osd libpthread-2.17.so [.] >> pthread_mutex_unlock 0.67% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> _raw_spin_lock 0.63% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> native_write_msr_safe 0.62% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> avc_has_perm_noaudit 0.58% ceph-osd ceph-osd [.] operator< 0.57% >> ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __schedule 0.57% ceph-osd >> [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __d_lookup_rcu 0.54% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] >> [k] __schedule >> >> >> after osd restart (300k iops) >> ------------------------------ >> 3.47% ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] operator new 1.92% ceph-osd >> libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] operator delete 1.86% swapper >> [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 1.52% ceph-osd libstdc++.so.6.0.19 >> [.] std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, >> std::allocator<char> >::basic_string 1.34% ceph-osd >> libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] tcmalloc::ThreadCache::ReleaseToCentralCache >> 1.24% ceph-osd libc-2.17.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3_back 1.23% ceph-osd >> ceph-osd [.] Mutex::Lock 1.21% ceph-osd libpthread-2.17.so [.] >> pthread_mutex_trylock 1.11% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> copy_user_enhanced_fast_string 0.95% ceph-osd libpthread-2.17.so [.] >> pthread_mutex_unlock 0.94% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> _raw_spin_lock 0.78% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __d_lookup_rcu >> 0.70% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_sendmsg 0.70% ceph-osd >> ceph-osd [.] Message::Message 0.68% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] >> __schedule 0.66% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] idle_cpu 0.65% >> ceph-osd libtcmalloc.so.4.1.2 [.] >> tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromSpans >> 0.64% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_write_msr_safe 0.61% >> ceph-osd ceph-osd [.] >> std::tr1::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release >> 0.60% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __schedule 0.60% ceph-osd >> libstdc++.so.6.0.19 [.] 0x00000000000bdd2b 0.57% ceph-osd ceph-osd [.] >> operator< 0.57% ceph-osd ceph-osd [.] crc32_iscsi_00 0.56% ceph-osd >> libstdc++.so.6.0.19 [.] std::string::_Rep::_M_dispose 0.55% ceph-osd >> [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __switch_to 0.54% ceph-osd libc-2.17.so [.] >> vfprintf 0.52% ceph-osd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] fget_light >> >> ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "aderumier" < aderum...@odiso.com > >> À: "Srinivasula Maram" < srinivasula.ma...@sandisk.com > >> Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >, "ceph-devel" >> < ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "Milosz Tanski" < mil...@adfin.com > >> Envoyé: Jeudi 23 Avril 2015 10:00:34 >> Objet: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd >> daemon improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >> >> Hi, >> I'm hitting this bug again today. >> >> So don't seem to be numa related (I have try to flush linux buffer to be >> sure). >> >> and tcmalloc is patched (I don't known how to verify that it's ok). >> >> I don't have restarted osd yet. >> >> Maybe some perf trace could be usefulll ? >> >> >> ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "aderumier" < aderum...@odiso.com > >> À: "Srinivasula Maram" < srinivasula.ma...@sandisk.com > >> Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >, "ceph-devel" >> < ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "Milosz Tanski" < mil...@adfin.com > >> Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Avril 2015 18:30:26 >> Objet: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd >> daemon improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >> >> Hi, >> >>>> I feel it is due to tcmalloc issue >> >> Indeed, I had patched one of my node, but not the other. >> So maybe I have hit this bug. (but I can't confirm, I don't have traces). >> >> But numa interleaving seem to help in my case (maybe not from 100->300k, but >> 250k->300k). >> >> I need to do more long tests to confirm that. >> >> >> ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Srinivasula Maram" < srinivasula.ma...@sandisk.com > >> À: "Mark Nelson" < mnel...@redhat.com >, "aderumier" >> < aderum...@odiso.com >, "Milosz Tanski" < mil...@adfin.com > >> Cc: "ceph-devel" < ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "ceph-users" >> < ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Avril 2015 16:34:33 >> Objet: RE: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd >> daemon improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >> >> I feel it is due to tcmalloc issue >> >> I have seen similar issue in my setup after 20 days. >> >> Thanks, >> Srinivas >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ceph-users [mailto: ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com ] On Behalf >> Of Mark Nelson >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:31 PM >> To: Alexandre DERUMIER; Milosz Tanski >> Cc: ceph-devel; ceph-users >> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd >> daemon improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >> >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> We should discuss this at the perf meeting today. We knew NUMA node affinity >> issues were going to crop up sooner or later (and indeed already have in >> some cases), but this is pretty major. It's probably time to really dig in >> and figure out how to deal with this. >> >> Note: this is one of the reasons I like small nodes with single sockets and >> fewer OSDs. >> >> Mark >> >>> On 04/22/2015 08:56 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have done a lot of test today, and it seem indeed numa related. >>> >>> My numastat was >>> >>> # numastat >>> node0 node1 >>> numa_hit 99075422 153976877 >>> numa_miss 167490965 1493663 >>> numa_foreign 1493663 167491417 >>> interleave_hit 157745 167015 >>> local_node 99049179 153830554 >>> other_node 167517697 1639986 >>> >>> So, a lot of miss. >>> >>> In this case , I can reproduce ios going from 85k to 300k iops, up and >>> down. >>> >>> now setting >>> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing >>> >>> and starting osd daemons with >>> >>> numactl --interleave=all /usr/bin/ceph-osd >>> >>> >>> I have a constant 300k iops ! >>> >>> >>> I wonder if it could be improve by binding osd daemons to specific numa >>> node. >>> I have 2 numanode of 10 cores with 6 osd, but I think it also require >>> ceph.conf osd threads tunning. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Mail original ----- >>> De: "Milosz Tanski" < mil...@adfin.com > >>> À: "aderumier" < aderum...@odiso.com > >>> Cc: "ceph-devel" < ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "ceph-users" >>> < ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Avril 2015 12:54:23 >>> Objet: Re: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd >>> daemon improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER < aderum...@odiso.com > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I wonder if it could be numa related, >>> >>> I'm using centos 7.1, >>> and auto numa balacning is enabled >>> >>> cat /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing = 1 >>> >>> Maybe osd daemon access to buffer on wrong numa node. >>> >>> I'll try to reproduce the problem >>> >>> >>> >>> Can you force the degenerate case using numactl? To either affirm or deny >>> your suspicion. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Mail original ----- >>> De: "aderumier" < aderum...@odiso.com > >>> À: "ceph-devel" < ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org >, "ceph-users" < >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Avril 2015 10:40:05 >>> Objet: [ceph-users] strange benchmark problem : restarting osd daemon >>> improve performance from 100k iops to 300k iops >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was doing some benchmarks, >>> I have found an strange behaviour. >>> >>> Using fio with rbd engine, I was able to reach around 100k iops. >>> (osd datas in linux buffer, iostat show 0% disk access) >>> >>> then after restarting all osd daemons, >>> >>> the same fio benchmark show now around 300k iops. >>> (osd datas in linux buffer, iostat show 0% disk access) >>> >>> >>> any ideas? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> before restarting osd >>> --------------------- >>> rbd_iodepth32-test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, >>> ioengine=rbd, iodepth=32 ... >>> fio-2.2.7-10-g51e9 >>> Starting 10 processes >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> ^Cbs: 10 (f=10): [r(10)] [2.9% done] [376.1MB/0KB/0KB /s] [96.6K/0/0 >>> iops] [eta 14m:45s] >>> fio: terminating on signal 2 >>> >>> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=10): err= 0: pid=17075: Wed Apr >>> 22 10:00:04 2015 read : io=11558MB, bw=451487KB/s, iops=112871, runt= >>> 26215msec slat (usec): min=5, max=3685, avg=16.89, stdev=17.38 clat >>> (usec): min=5, max=62584, avg=2695.80, stdev=5351.23 lat (usec): >>> min=109, max=62598, avg=2712.68, stdev=5350.42 clat percentiles >>> (usec): >>> | 1.00th=[ 155], 5.00th=[ 183], 10.00th=[ 205], 20.00th=[ 247], >>> | 30.00th=[ 294], 40.00th=[ 354], 50.00th=[ 446], 60.00th=[ 660], >>> | 70.00th=[ 1176], 80.00th=[ 3152], 90.00th=[ 9024], 95.00th=[14656], >>> | 99.00th=[25984], 99.50th=[30336], 99.90th=[38656], 99.95th=[41728], >>> | 99.99th=[47360] >>> bw (KB /s): min=23928, max=154416, per=10.07%, avg=45462.82, >>> stdev=28809.95 lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, >>> 250=20.79% lat (usec) : 500=32.74%, 750=8.99%, 1000=5.03% lat (msec) : >>> 2=8.37%, 4=6.21%, 10=8.90%, 20=6.60%, 50=2.37% lat (msec) : 100=0.01% >>> cpu : usr=15.90%, sys=3.01%, ctx=765446, majf=0, minf=8710 IO depths : >>> 1=0.4%, 2=0.9%, 4=2.3%, 8=7.4%, 16=75.5%, 32=13.6%, >=64=0.0% submit : >>> 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% >>> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=93.6%, 8=2.8%, 16=2.4%, 32=1.2%, 64=0.0%, >>>> =64=0.0% issued : total=r=2958935/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, >>> drop=r=0/w=0/d=0 latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, >>> depth=32 >>> >>> Run status group 0 (all jobs): >>> READ: io=11558MB, aggrb=451487KB/s, minb=451487KB/s, maxb=451487KB/s, >>> mint=26215msec, maxt=26215msec >>> >>> Disk stats (read/write): >>> sdg: ios=0/29, merge=0/16, ticks=0/3, in_queue=3, util=0.01% >>> [root@ceph1-3 fiorbd]# ./fio fiorbd >>> rbd_iodepth32-test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, >>> ioengine=rbd, iodepth=32 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> AFTER RESTARTING OSDS >>> ---------------------- >>> [root@ceph1-3 fiorbd]# ./fio fiorbd >>> rbd_iodepth32-test: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, >>> ioengine=rbd, iodepth=32 ... >>> fio-2.2.7-10-g51e9 >>> Starting 10 processes >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> rbd engine: RBD version: 0.1.9 >>> ^Cbs: 10 (f=10): [r(10)] [0.2% done] [1155MB/0KB/0KB /s] [296K/0/0 >>> iops] [eta 01h:09m:27s] >>> fio: terminating on signal 2 >>> >>> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=10): err= 0: pid=18252: Wed Apr >>> 22 10:02:28 2015 read : io=7655.7MB, bw=1036.8MB/s, iops=265218, >>> runt= 7389msec slat (usec): min=5, max=3406, avg=26.59, stdev=40.35 >>> clat >>> (usec): min=8, max=684328, avg=930.43, stdev=6419.12 lat (usec): >>> min=154, max=684342, avg=957.02, stdev=6419.28 clat percentiles >>> (usec): >>> | 1.00th=[ 243], 5.00th=[ 314], 10.00th=[ 366], 20.00th=[ 450], >>> | 30.00th=[ 524], 40.00th=[ 604], 50.00th=[ 692], 60.00th=[ 796], >>> | 70.00th=[ 924], 80.00th=[ 1096], 90.00th=[ 1400], 95.00th=[ 1720], >>> | 99.00th=[ 2672], 99.50th=[ 3248], 99.90th=[ 5920], 99.95th=[ 9792], >>> | 99.99th=[436224] >>> bw (KB /s): min=32614, max=143160, per=10.19%, avg=108076.46, >>> stdev=28263.82 lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, >>> 250=1.23% lat (usec) : 500=25.64%, 750=29.15%, 1000=18.84% lat (msec) >>> : 2=22.19%, 4=2.69%, 10=0.21%, 20=0.02%, 50=0.01% lat (msec) : >>> 250=0.01%, 500=0.02%, 750=0.01% cpu : usr=44.06%, sys=11.26%, >>> ctx=642620, majf=0, minf=6832 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.5%, 4=2.0%, >>> 8=11.5%, 16=77.8%, 32=8.1%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, >>> 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, >>> 4=94.1%, 8=1.3%, 16=2.3%, 32=2.3%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued : >>> total=r=1959697/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0 latency : >>> target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32 >>> >>> Run status group 0 (all jobs): >>> READ: io=7655.7MB, aggrb=1036.8MB/s, minb=1036.8MB/s, >>> maxb=1036.8MB/s, mint=7389msec, maxt=7389msec >>> >>> Disk stats (read/write): >>> sdg: ios=0/21, merge=0/10, ticks=0/2, in_queue=2, util=0.03% >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> CEPH LOG >>> -------- >>> >>> before restarting osd >>> ---------------------- >>> >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:17.568095 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2144 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11330: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 298 MB/s rd, 76465 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:18.574524 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2145 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11331: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 333 MB/s rd, 85355 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:19.579351 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2146 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11332: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 343 MB/s rd, 87932 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:20.591586 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2147 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11333: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 328 MB/s rd, 84151 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:21.600650 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2148 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11334: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 237 MB/s rd, 60855 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:22.607966 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2149 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11335: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 144 MB/s rd, 36935 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:23.617780 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2150 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11336: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 321 MB/s rd, 82334 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:24.622341 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2151 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11337: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 368 MB/s rd, 94211 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:25.628432 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2152 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11338: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 244 MB/s rd, 62644 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:26.632855 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2153 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11339: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 175 MB/s rd, 44997 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:27.636573 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2154 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11340: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 122 MB/s rd, 31259 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:28.645784 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2155 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11341: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 229 MB/s rd, 58674 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:29.657128 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2156 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11342: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 271 MB/s rd, 69501 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:30.662796 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2157 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11343: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 211 MB/s rd, 54020 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:31.666421 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2158 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11344: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 164 MB/s rd, 42001 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:32.670842 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2159 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11345: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 134 MB/s rd, 34380 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:33.681357 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2160 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11346: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 293 MB/s rd, 75213 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:34.692177 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2161 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11347: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 337 MB/s rd, 86353 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:35.697401 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2162 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11348: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 229 MB/s rd, 58839 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 09:53:36.699309 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2163 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11349: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 390 GB data, 391 GB used, 904 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 152 MB/s rd, 39117 op/s >>> >>> >>> restarting osd >>> --------------- >>> >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:09.766906 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2255 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.0 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:09.790212 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2256 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e849: 9 osds: 8 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:09.793050 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2257 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11439: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 8 >>> stale+active+remapped, 106 stale+active+clean, 54 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+794 >>> active+clean; 419 GB data, 420 GB used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail; 516 >>> kB/s rd, 130 op/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:10.795966 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2258 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e850: 9 osds: 8 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:10.796675 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2259 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11440: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 8 >>> stale+active+remapped, 106 stale+active+clean, 54 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+794 >>> active+clean; 419 GB data, 420 GB used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:11.798257 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2260 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11441: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 8 >>> stale+active+remapped, 106 stale+active+clean, 54 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+794 >>> active+clean; 419 GB data, 420 GB used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:12.339696 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2262 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.1 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:12.800168 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2263 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e851: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:12.806498 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2264 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11443: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 13 >>> stale+active+remapped, 216 stale+active+clean, 49 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+684 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:13.804186 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2265 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e852: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:13.805216 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2266 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11444: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 13 >>> stale+active+remapped, 216 stale+active+clean, 49 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+684 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:14.781785 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2268 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.2 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:14.810571 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2269 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e853: 9 osds: 6 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:14.813871 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2270 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11445: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 22 >>> stale+active+remapped, 300 stale+active+clean, 40 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+600 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:15.810333 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2271 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e854: 9 osds: 6 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:15.811425 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2272 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11446: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 22 >>> stale+active+remapped, 300 stale+active+clean, 40 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+600 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:16.395105 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2273 : cluster >>> [INF] HEALTH_WARN; 2 pgs degraded; 323 pgs stale; 2 pgs stuck >>> degraded; 64 pgs stuck unclean; 2 pgs stuck undersized; 2 pgs >>> undersized; 3/9 in osds are down; clock skew detected on mon.ceph1-2 >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:16.814432 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2274 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.1 10.7.0.152:6800/14848 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:16.814938 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2275 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e855: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:16.815942 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2276 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11447: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 22 >>> stale+active+remapped, 300 stale+active+clean, 40 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+600 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:17.222281 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2278 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.3 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:17.819371 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2279 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e856: 9 osds: 6 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:17.822041 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2280 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11448: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 25 >>> stale+active+remapped, 394 stale+active+clean, 37 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+506 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:18.551068 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2282 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.6 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:18.819387 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2283 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.2 10.7.0.152:6812/15410 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:18.821134 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2284 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e857: 9 osds: 6 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:18.824440 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2285 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11449: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 30 >>> stale+active+remapped, 502 stale+active+clean, 32 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+398 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:19.820947 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2287 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e858: 9 osds: 6 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:19.821853 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2288 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11450: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 30 >>> stale+active+remapped, 502 stale+active+clean, 32 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+398 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:20.828047 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2290 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.3 10.7.0.152:6816/15971 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:20.828431 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2291 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e859: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:20.829126 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2292 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11451: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 30 >>> stale+active+remapped, 502 stale+active+clean, 32 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+398 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:20.991343 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2294 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.7 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:21.830389 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2295 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.0 10.7.0.152:6804/14481 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:21.832518 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2296 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e860: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:21.836129 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2297 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11452: 964 pgs: 1 active+undersized+degraded, 35 >>> stale+active+remapped, 608 stale+active+clean, 27 active+remapped, >>> stale+active+292 >>> active+clean, 1 stale+active+undersized+degraded; 419 GB data, 420 GB >>> used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:22.830456 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2298 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.6 10.7.0.153:6808/21955 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:22.832171 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2299 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e861: 9 osds: 8 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:22.836272 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2300 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11453: 964 pgs: 3 active+undersized+degraded, 27 >>> stale+active+remapped, 498 stale+active+clean, 2 peering, 28 >>> active+remapped, 402 active+clean, 4 remapped+peering; 419 GB data, >>> 420 GB used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:23.420309 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2302 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.8 marked itself down >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:23.833708 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2303 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e862: 9 osds: 7 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:23.836459 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2304 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11454: 964 pgs: 3 active+undersized+degraded, 44 >>> stale+active+remapped, 587 stale+active+clean, 2 peering, 11 >>> active+remapped, 313 active+clean, 4 remapped+peering; 419 GB data, >>> 420 GB used, 874 GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:24.832905 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2305 : cluster >>> [INF] osd.7 10.7.0.153:6804/22536 boot >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:24.834381 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2306 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e863: 9 osds: 8 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:24.836977 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2307 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11455: 964 pgs: 3 active+undersized+degraded, 31 >>> stale+active+remapped, 503 stale+active+clean, 4 >>> active+undersized+degraded+remapped, 5 peering, 13 active+remapped, >>> 397 active+clean, 8 remapped+peering; 419 GB data, 420 GB used, 874 >>> GB / 1295 GB avail >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:25.834459 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2309 : cluster >>> [INF] osdmap e864: 9 osds: 8 up, 9 in >>> 2015-04-22 10:00:25.835727 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2310 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11456: 964 pgs: 3 active+undersized+degraded, 31 >>> stale+active+remapped, 503 stale+active+clean, 4 >>> active+undersized+degraded+remapped, 5 peering, 13 active >>> >>> >>> AFTER OSD RESTART >>> ------------------ >>> >>> >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:27.609052 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2339 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11478: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 786 MB/s rd, 196 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:28.618082 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2340 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11479: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 1578 MB/s rd, 394 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:30.629067 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2341 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11480: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 932 MB/s rd, 233 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:32.645890 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2342 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11481: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 627 MB/s rd, 156 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:33.652634 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2343 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11482: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 1034 MB/s rd, 258 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:35.655657 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2344 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11483: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 529 MB/s rd, 132 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:37.674332 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2345 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11484: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 770 MB/s rd, 192 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:38.679445 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2346 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11485: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 1358 MB/s rd, 339 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:40.690037 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2347 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11486: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 649 MB/s rd, 162 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:42.707164 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2348 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11487: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 580 MB/s rd, 145 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:43.713736 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2349 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11488: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 962 MB/s rd, 240 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:45.718658 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2350 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11489: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 506 MB/s rd, 126 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:47.737358 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2351 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11490: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 774 MB/s rd, 193 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:48.743338 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2352 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11491: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 1363 MB/s rd, 340 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:50.746685 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2353 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11492: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 662 MB/s rd, 165 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:52.762461 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2354 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11493: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 593 MB/s rd, 148 kop/s >>> 2015-04-22 10:09:53.767729 mon.0 10.7.0.152:6789/0 2355 : cluster >>> [INF] pgmap v11494: 964 pgs: 2 active+undersized+degraded, 62 >>> active+remapped, 900 active+clean; 419 GB data, 421 GB used, 874 GB / >>> 1295 GB avail; 938 MB/s rd, 234 kop/s >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> ________________________________ >> >> PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is >> intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the >> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, >> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify >> the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy >> any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies >> or electronically stored copies). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > > > > -- > С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязович > Моб.: +79229045757 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
