Sage, Thanks for your comments. In other word, CephFs is ready enough for production, but need a good baby sitter to look after her. I will make a test for CephFs, if any question, I will let you know.
Best Regards -- Ray On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Sage Weil <s...@newdream.net> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Ray Sun wrote: > > Cephers, > > Many people told me ceph is ready for production except the cephFS, is > this > > true? Any why it is? Can any one explain this to me? Thanks a lot. > > "Ready for production" is a subjective judgement call. The reason why we > are cautious when recommending it is that there is not a fully functioning > fsck, so you should be careful what kind of data you store on it. We do > have some limited check and disaster recovery tools, but they aren't > complete or friendly; if you hit a corruption bug that we haven't you may > need help from developers to fix it. That said, I don't think we have > seen a bug that brought down the system in a while. > > See > > http://ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/early-adopters/ > > Thanks! > sage >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
