Hello Yann, Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I found it by chance during a search, since you didn't include me in the reply, I never got it on my email.
I am interested in what you mentioned so far. I'm not looking into making any production grade cluster, just a couple of nodes for testing ceph and its failure scenarios. Current ubuntu and Debian based distributions for Banana pro are based on kernel 3.4.103. I see you used a more recent kernel, did you get it ready made or you compiled it yourself ? I actually have the choice now of attaching the osd disks via either sata or usb. In buying those Chinese 16gb ssd disks. They are good for i/o but not for write speed. If you could provide any more info, then it would be great. Thanks! On 15 Feb 2015 17:48, "hp cre" <hpc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, I'm currently studying the possibility of creating a small > ceph cluster on arm nodes. > > The reasonably priced boards I found (like the banana pi/pro, Orange > pi/pro/h3, etc..) most have either dual core or quad core Allwinner chips > and 1GB RAM. They also use a micro sd card for os and a sata drive > connection. > > Has anyone ever tried a deployment like this? I want to know if that > hardware is enough to create a usable cluster. > > I dont want loads of storage, just want to end up with a responsive os > and a 10 gb storage pool. > > Beyond the basic minimum hardware listed on the ceph documents, i haven't > found much info on this. The pilot implementation with startup company > calxeda was on 64-bit arm boards, not 32-bit, and they were a custom > spec. > > Any ideas welcome. Thanks. >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com