Hello Yann,

Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately,  I found it by chance during a
search, since you didn't include me in the reply, I never got it on my
email.

I am interested in what you mentioned so far. I'm not looking into making
any production grade cluster,  just a couple of nodes for testing ceph and
its failure scenarios.

Current ubuntu and Debian based distributions for Banana pro are based on
kernel 3.4.103. I see you used a more recent kernel,  did you get it ready
made or you compiled it yourself ?

I actually have the choice now of attaching the osd disks via either sata
or usb. In buying those Chinese 16gb ssd disks. They are good for i/o but
not for write speed.

If you could provide any more info,  then it would be great.

Thanks!
On 15 Feb 2015 17:48, "hp cre" <hpc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,  I'm currently studying the possibility of creating a small
> ceph cluster on arm nodes.
>
> The reasonably priced boards I found (like the banana pi/pro, Orange
> pi/pro/h3, etc..) most have either dual core or quad core Allwinner chips
> and 1GB RAM. They also use a micro sd card for os and a sata drive
> connection.
>
> Has anyone ever tried a deployment like this? I want to know if that
> hardware is enough to create a usable cluster.
>
> I dont want loads of storage,  just want to end up with a responsive os
> and a 10 gb storage pool.
>
> Beyond the basic minimum hardware listed on the ceph documents,  i haven't
> found much info on this.  The pilot implementation with startup company
> calxeda was on 64-bit arm boards,  not 32-bit,  and they were a custom
> spec.
>
> Any ideas welcome.  Thanks.
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to