It's not merely unstable, it's not actually complete. The XIOMessenger is merged so that things don't get too far out of sync, but it should not be used by anybody except developers who are working on it. :) -Greg On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:43 PM Nicheal <zay11...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-02-03 0:48 GMT+08:00 Gregory Farnum <g...@gregs42.com>: > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky <and...@arhont.com> > wrote: > >> Hi cephers, > >> > >> I've got three questions: > >> > >> 1. Does anyone have an estimation on the release dates of the next > stable > >> ceph branch? > > > > We should be branching Hammer from master today, and it's > > feature-frozen at this point. I think we're expecting another month to > > release, but I'm not certain and it will depend on if we run across > > any issues anyway. > > > >> 2. Will the new stable release have improvements in the following > areas: a) > >> working with ssd disks; b) cache tier > > > > I'm not sure what you mean about improvements for SSD disks, but the > > OSD should be generally a bit faster. There are several cache tier > > improvements included that should improve performance on most > > workloads that others can speak about in more detail than I. > > > >> 3. Will the new stable release introduce support for native RDMA / > >> Infiniband networking without the need of using IP over Infiniband? > > > > No. > It seems xioMessenger is already merged into master. It looks like a > RDMA support? But it is not stable now > > > > > -Greg > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
