Hi,Sage.
Yes, Firefly.
[root@ceph05 ~]# ceph --version
ceph version 0.80.8 (69eaad7f8308f21573c604f121956e64679a52a7)
Yes, I have seen this behavior.
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rbd info vm-160-disk-1
rbd image 'vm-160-disk-1':
size 32768 MB in 8192 objects
order 22 (4096 kB objects)
block_name_prefix: rbd_data.179faf52eb141f2
format: 2
features: layering
parent: rbd/base-145-disk-1@__base__
overlap: 32768 MB
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rbd rm vm-160-disk-1
Removing image: 100% complete...done.
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rbd info vm-160-disk-1
2015-01-28 10:39:01.595785 7f1fbea9e760 -1 librbd::ImageCtx: error finding
header: (2) No such file or directoryrbd: error opening image
vm-160-disk-1: (2) No such file or directory
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbdcache ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
5944 5944 249633
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbdcache ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
5857 5857 245979
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbd ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
4377 4377 183819
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbdcache ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
5017 5017 210699
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbdcache ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
5015 5015 210615
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbd ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rcachehe ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
1986 1986 83412
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbd ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
981 981 41202
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbd ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
802 802 33684
[root@ceph08 ceph]# rados -p rbdcache ls | grep 179faf52eb141f2 | wc
1611 1611 67662
Thank, Sage!
Tue Jan 27 2015 at 7:01:43 PM, Sage Weil <s...@newdream.net>:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Irek Fasikhov wrote:
> > Hi,All.
> > Indeed, there is a problem. Removed 1 TB of data space on a cluster is
> not
> > cleared. This feature of the behavior or a bug? And how long will it be
> > cleaned?
>
> Your subject says cache tier but I don't see it in the 'ceph df' output
> below. The cache tiers will store 'whiteout' objects that cache object
> non-existence that could be delaying some deletion. You can wrangle the
> cluster into flushing those with
>
> ceph osd pool set <cachepool> cache_target_dirty_ratio .05
>
> (though you'll probably want to change it back to the default .4 later).
>
> If there's no cache tier involved, there may be another problem. What
> version is this? Firefly?
>
> sage
>
> >
> > Sat Sep 20 2014 at 8:19:24 AM, Mika?l Cluseau <mclus...@isi.nc>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have weird behaviour on my firefly "test + convenience
> > storage" cluster. It consists of 2 nodes with a light imbalance
> > in available space:
> >
> > # id weight type name up/down reweight
> > -1 14.58 root default
> > -2 8.19 host store-1
> > 1 2.73 osd.1 up 1
> > 0 2.73 osd.0 up 1
> > 5 2.73 osd.5 up 1
> > -3 6.39 host store-2
> > 2 2.73 osd.2 up 1
> > 3 2.73 osd.3 up 1
> > 4 0.93 osd.4 up 1
> >
> > I used to store ~8TB of rbd volumes, coming to a near-full
> > state. There was some annoying "stuck misplaced" PGs so I began
> > to remove 4.5TB of data; the weird thing is: the space hasn't
> > been reclaimed on the OSDs, they keeped stuck around 84% usage.
> > I tried to move PGs around and it happens that the space is
> > correctly "reclaimed" if I take an OSD out, let him empty it XFS
> > volume and then take it in again.
> >
> > I'm currently applying this to and OSD in turn, but I though it
> > could be worth telling about this. The current ceph df output
> > is:
> >
> > GLOBAL:
> > SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED
> > 12103G 5311G 6792G 56.12
> > POOLS:
> > NAME ID USED %USED OBJECTS
> > data 0 0 0 0
> > metadata 1 0 0 0
> > rbd 2 444G 3.67 117333
> > [...]
> > archives-ec 14 3628G 29.98 928902
> > archives 15 37518M 0.30 273167
> >
> > Before "just moving data", AVAIL was around 3TB.
> >
> > I finished the process with the OSDs on store-1, who show the
> > following space usage now:
> >
> > /dev/sdb1 2.8T 1.4T 1.4T 50%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0
> > /dev/sdc1 2.8T 1.3T 1.5T 46%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-1
> > /dev/sdd1 2.8T 1.3T 1.5T 48%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-5
> >
> > I'm currently fixing OSD 2, 3 will be the last one to be fixed.
> > The df on store-2 shows the following:
> >
> > /dev/sdb1 2.8T 1.9T 855G 70%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-2
> > /dev/sdc1 2.8T 2.4T 417G 86%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-3
> > /dev/sdd1 932G 481G 451G 52%
> > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-4
> >
> > OSD 2 was at 84% 3h ago, and OSD 3 was ~75%.
> >
> > During rbd rm (that took a bit more that 3 days), ceph log was
> > showing things like that:
> >
> > 2014-09-03 16:17:38.831640 mon.0 192.168.1.71:6789/0 417194 :
> > [INF] pgmap v14953987: 3196 pgs: 2882 active+clean, 314
> > active+remapped; 7647 GB data, 11067 GB used, 3828 GB / 14896 GB
> > avail; 0 B/s rd, 6778 kB/s wr, 18 op/s; -5/5757286 objects
> > degraded (-0.000%)
> > [...]
> > 2014-09-05 03:09:59.895507 mon.0 192.168.1.71:6789/0 513976 :
> > [INF] pgmap v15050766: 3196 pgs: 2882 active+clean, 314
> > active+remapped; 6010 GB data, 11156 GB used, 3740 GB / 14896 GB
> > avail; 0 B/s rd, 0 B/s wr, 8 op/s; -388631/5247320 objects
> > degraded (-7.406%)
> > [...]
> > 2014-09-06 03:56:50.008109 mon.0 192.168.1.71:6789/0 580816 :
> > [INF] pgmap v15117604: 3196 pgs: 2882 active+clean, 314
> > active+remapped; 4865 GB data, 11207 GB used, 3689 GB / 14896 GB
> > avail; 0 B/s rd, 6117 kB/s wr, 22 op/s; -706519/3699415 objects
> > degraded (-19.098%)
> > 2014-09-06 03:56:44.476903 osd.0 192.168.1.71:6805/11793 729 :
> > [WRN] 1 slow requests, 1 included below; oldest blocked for >
> > 30.058434 secs
> > 2014-09-06 03:56:44.476909 osd.0 192.168.1.71:6805/11793 730 :
> > [WRN] slow request 30.058434 seconds old, received at 2014-09-06
> > 03:56:14.418429: osd_op(client.19843278.0:46081
> > rb.0.c7fd7f.238e1f29.00000000b3fa [delete] 15.b8fb7551
> > ack+ondisk+write e38950) v4 currently waiting for blocked object
> > 2014-09-06 03:56:49.477785 osd.0 192.168.1.71:6805/11793 731 :
> > [WRN] 2 slow requests, 1 included below; oldest blocked for >
> > 35.059315 secs
> > [... stabilizes here:]
> > 2014-09-06 22:13:48.771531 mon.0 192.168.1.71:6789/0 632527 :
> > [INF] pgmap v15169313: 3196 pgs: 2882 active+clean, 314
> > active+remapped; 4139 GB data, 11215 GB used, 3681 GB / 14896 GB
> > avail; 64 B/s rd, 64 B/s wr, 0 op/s; -883219/3420796 objects
> > degraded (-25.819%)
> > [...]
> > 2014-09-07 03:09:48.491325 mon.0 192.168.1.71:6789/0 633880 :
> > [INF] pgmap v15170666: 3196 pgs: 2882 active+clean, 314
> > active+remapped; 4139 GB data, 11215 GB used, 3681 GB / 14896 GB
> > avail; 18727 B/s wr, 2 op/s; -883219/3420796 objects degraded
> > (-25.819%)
> >
> > And now, during data movement I described before:
> >
> > 2014-09-20 15:16:13.394694 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v15344707: 3196
> > pgs: 2132 active+clean, 432 active+remapped+wait_backfill, 621
> > active+remapped, 11 active+remapped+backfilling; 4139 GB data,
> > 6831 GB used, 5271 GB / 12103 GB avail; 379097/3792969 objects
> > degraded (9.995%)
> >
> > If some ceph developer wants me to do something or to provide
> > some data, please say so quickly, I will probably process OSD 3
> > in ~16-20h.
> > (of course, I'd prefer not loose the data btw :-))
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
