Hi Chad, That sounds bizarre to me, and I can't reproduce it. I added an osd (which was previously not in the crush map) to a fake host=test:
ceph osd crush create-or-move osd.52 1.0 rack=RJ45 host=test that resulted in some data movement of course. Then I removed that osd from the crush map: ceph osd crush rm osd.52 which left the test host in the crushmap but now it's weight is zero. I waited until all the PGs where active and clean, then removed that host: ceph osd crush remove test And there was no data movement. As far as I've experienced, an entry in the crush map with a _crush_ weight of zero is equivalent to that entry not being in the map. (In fact, I use this to drain OSDs ... I just ceph osd crush reweight osd.X 0, then sometime later I crush rm the osd, without incurring any secondary data movement). Cheers, Dan October 15 2014 6:07 PM, "Chad Seys" <cws...@physics.wisc.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > When I remove all OSDs on a given host, then wait for all objects (PGs?) to > be to be active+clean, then remove the host (ceph osd crush remove hostname), > that causes the objects to shuffle around the cluster again. > Why does the CRUSH map depend on hosts that no longer have OSDs on them? > > A wonderment question, > C. > > _______________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
