Added a comment about the approach. -Sam
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Somnath Roy <somnath....@sandisk.com> wrote: > Hi Sam/Sage, > > As we discussed earlier, enabling the present OpTracker code degrading > performance severely. For example, in my setup a single OSD node with 10 > clients is reaching ~103K read iops with io served from memory while > optracking is disabled but enabling optracker it is reduced to ~39K iops. > Probably, running OSD without enabling OpTracker is not an option for many > of Ceph users. > > Now, by sharding the Optracker:: ops_in_flight_lock (thus xlist > ops_in_flight) and removing some other bottlenecks I am able to match the > performance of OpTracking enabled OSD with OpTracking disabled, but with the > expense of ~1 extra cpu core. > > In this process I have also fixed the following tracker. > > > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9384 > > > > and probably http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8885 too. > > > > I have created following pull request for the same. Please review it. > > > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2440 > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Somnath > > > > > ________________________________ > > PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is > intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the > reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify > the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy > any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies > or electronically stored copies). > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
